Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Iron Fist Versus Socialism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -
An interesting reflection, entitled "My Thought on Socialism in America," has been posted this week at: click here 1) The author seems to think that Roosevelt "command economy," during W.W.II was socialism. He wrote: "In W.W.II, the US government commandeered the auto manufacturers to make tanks and jeeps instead of private cars. When superior weapons were called for and the atomic bomb was foreseen, Washington did not ask for bids from the private sector; it created the Manhattan Project to do it itself, with no concern for balance sheets or profit and loss statements. Women and blacks were given skilled factory jobs they had been traditionally denied. Hollywood was enlisted to make propaganda films. Indeed, much of the nation's activities, including farming, manufacturing, mining, communications, labor, education, and cultural undertakings were in some fashion brought under new and significant government control, with the war effort coming before private profit. And in the wake of this directed capital allocation and unwitting move toward wartime socialism, America won the war and became a prosperous society."

I do not think that a goal-oriented economy should be identified with socialism. The author continue: "So, likewise in peacetime, we can think of socialism as putting people before profit, with all the basics guaranteed - health care, education, decent housing, food, jobs. Those who swear by free enterprise argue that the "socialism" of World War Two was instituted only because of the exigencies of the war. That's true, but it doesn't alter the key point that it had been immediately recognized by the government that the wasteful and inefficient capitalist system, always in need of proper financial care and feeding, was no way to run a country trying to win a war."

2) Referring to Soviet Union, the author writes: "Socialism came to be understood [in America] as a dictatorship. It meant Stalinist repression, a suffocating planned economy, no freedom of enterprise, no freedom to change jobs, elimination of personal expression, and other similar vagaries." Planed economy can serve different goals, those that we approve and those that we do not approve. Stalinism should be identified with brutality and violence, against Soviet people, not with planned economy. Planning is an essential precondition for a successful activity at any level.

3) Those who are not familiar with Stalinism are likely to learn a lot about it from my short book. For details see
h t t p : / /csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/excerpts.html


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -



Ludwik Kowalski is a retired physics teacher (Professor emeritus, Montclair State University, New Jersey, USA). He is the author of two recently-published FREE books:

1) "Hell on Earth: Brutality and violence under the Stalinist regime" (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What makes economics so difficult to learn?

Simplified macroeconomics

Stalin and Russian Orthodox Church

Supply and demand

Socialism Is Not Marxism: Extracts From a Website

Red Army During World War II


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Yes, Stalin's socialism was goal-oriented. But... by Ludwik Kowalski on Friday, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:53:07 PM
I think you have a good point to make, but you end... by WML on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:59:39 AM
"If not socialism, then what was it? I know, but ... by William Whitten on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:38:47 AM
What is a "fake revolution"?... by Ludwik Kowalski on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:47:54 AM
 "What is a "fake revolution"?... by William Whitten on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:10:15 PM
Which socialist state are you referring to?... by Ludwik Kowalski on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:38:32 PM
This is a systems analysis applied to the politica... by William Whitten on Saturday, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:36:32 PM
I still do not know which country you are referrin... by Ludwik Kowalski on Sunday, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:39:51 AM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2015, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum