Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/21/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Introducing the Facebook Nation Health Care Plan

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I'm self-employed. I can't afford healthcare. I go to a free clinic that is truly wonderful - which, by the way, I'm grateful for their care. What if we funded these community-free clinics better (call it Tier One insurance)? What if we augmented insurance coverage by non-profits, such as, Blue Cross, to provide for a Second Tier of coverage at hospitals when more critical care is needed? Tier One (for people without health insurance who need basic care) would extend coverage for everyone (at better-funded free clinics in smaller communities). This would take the burden away from "emergency-room-care abuses," for one, where much of the healthcare crisis lies anyway.

Secondly, why can't we look at experimenting with a more flexible system or a Bill with flexibility built-in (instead of instituting a complete and permanent overhaul)? We need less permanency until we find a mix and a fix that works for all of us addressing all concerns. Medicine is "practice" after-all, is it not? We're always experimenting and looking for new solutions when it comes to finding cures for diseases, right? That's the way we need to look at this "disease" called "health care" and attack the problem that way. The resistance to the "Obama Plan is because people are afraid (rightfully so) that another huge, money-wasting bureaucracy will be created. Why not appeal to "compassionate conservatives" with "compassionate care" - in an effort to compromise"? However, in essence, it would win America the care we all so desperately need.

Thirdly, why can't we regulate current non-profit insurance companies that really are not de facto non-profits per se, e.g. Blue Cross. They are and they aren't a non-profit. Instead of Blue Cross acting as regional philanthropies - dolling out 100s of millions of dollars of "profit" to a myriad of causes, why don't we just have that money go toward "Tier Two" funding? Tier Two would create an affordable, basic "insurance" for the uninsured - perhaps run by a conglomerate of nationwide non-profits (not Govt. run).

Fourthly, we ought to let healthy people write-off the full amount of Tier Two insurance on their taxes. Monetary incentives for better health are already being used in corporate America for gym memberships and the like. Moreover, if we are going to tax people for Tobacco use we ought to "tax" them again with higher Tier 2 insurance if they smoke the same goes for other unhealthy habits.

And finally, the co-pay for those under $40K (single) ought to be $50 per month and for $80K households or below: $100. So, for the cost of a cable bill for singles - one gets health care. For families - they get healthcare for the cost of a family-cell-phone plan. Those are fair, manageable fees. I call this The Facebook Nation Health Care Plan because it has evolved from listening to friends and discussions on the social networking Website. It's sensible and reasonable. Isn't that what we are asking for to our Nation's health care dilemma?

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
A sensible and reasonable prescription for our nationwide healthcare crisi

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

I'm disappointed by the "pay for play" atmosphere in American politics that has emerged today. As a researcher, amateur historian, writer and documentarist, I'm of the opinion that the Founding Fathers did not intend to equate free speech with paid (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Blue Cross is no longer "non profit" by August Adams on Monday, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:57:37 AM
Way too reasonable by BaronVonRothschild on Monday, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:06:36 PM
Who will pay? by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:54:03 PM