Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Introducing the Facebook Nation Health Care Plan

By       Message Scott Spinucci     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 12/21/09

- Advertisement -

I'm self-employed. I can't afford healthcare. I go to a free clinic that is truly wonderful - which, by the way, I'm grateful for their care. What if we funded these community-free clinics better (call it Tier One insurance)? What if we augmented insurance coverage by non-profits, such as, Blue Cross, to provide for a Second Tier of coverage at hospitals when more critical care is needed? Tier One (for people without health insurance who need basic care) would extend coverage for everyone (at better-funded free clinics in smaller communities). This would take the burden away from "emergency-room-care abuses," for one, where much of the healthcare crisis lies anyway.

Secondly, why can't we look at experimenting with a more flexible system or a Bill with flexibility built-in (instead of instituting a complete and permanent overhaul)? We need less permanency until we find a mix and a fix that works for all of us addressing all concerns. Medicine is "practice" after-all, is it not? We're always experimenting and looking for new solutions when it comes to finding cures for diseases, right? That's the way we need to look at this "disease" called "health care" and attack the problem that way. The resistance to the "Obama Plan is because people are afraid (rightfully so) that another huge, money-wasting bureaucracy will be created. Why not appeal to "compassionate conservatives" with "compassionate care" - in an effort to compromise"? However, in essence, it would win America the care we all so desperately need.

Thirdly, why can't we regulate current non-profit insurance companies that really are not de facto non-profits per se, e.g. Blue Cross. They are and they aren't a non-profit. Instead of Blue Cross acting as regional philanthropies - dolling out 100s of millions of dollars of "profit" to a myriad of causes, why don't we just have that money go toward "Tier Two" funding? Tier Two would create an affordable, basic "insurance" for the uninsured - perhaps run by a conglomerate of nationwide non-profits (not Govt. run).

Fourthly, we ought to let healthy people write-off the full amount of Tier Two insurance on their taxes. Monetary incentives for better health are already being used in corporate America for gym memberships and the like. Moreover, if we are going to tax people for Tobacco use we ought to "tax" them again with higher Tier 2 insurance if they smoke the same goes for other unhealthy habits.

And finally, the co-pay for those under $40K (single) ought to be $50 per month and for $80K households or below: $100. So, for the cost of a cable bill for singles - one gets health care. For families - they get healthcare for the cost of a family-cell-phone plan. Those are fair, manageable fees. I call this The Facebook Nation Health Care Plan because it has evolved from listening to friends and discussions on the social networking Website. It's sensible and reasonable. Isn't that what we are asking for to our Nation's health care dilemma?
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
A sensible and reasonable prescription for our nationwide healthcare crisi

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

I'm disappointed by the "pay for play" atmosphere in American politics that has emerged today. As a researcher, amateur historian, writer and documentarist, I'm of the opinion that the Founding Fathers did not intend to equate free speech with paid (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israeli-Palestine Crisis Calls for a Three-State Solution

Solving the Pay-for-Play Crisis in America Post Citizen's United

Introducing the Facebook Nation Health Care Plan