Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Including Non-Occupiers And Strengthening A Movement

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 11/8/11

David Swanson sent this out. Since the writer is maintaining anonymity, we're publishing it as a press release, even though it's really not one. 
Here are some words from David, preceding the article:

You meet simply wonderful and incredibly smart people at nonviolent occupations.  At least I do.  I just met someone who knows exactly what they are talking about but does not want to be identified in any way other than by the name "Prof."  Prof has been thinking about how to strengthen the Occupy movement, how to build a structure for it -- or rather how to allow it to build one itself, from the ground up, with ideas moving up levels of representation, not down as we're all so used to, and with people who cannot or will not or anyway do not sleep in public squares able to take part in a lasting and effective way.  I cannot recommend too strongly that every Occupation look into this and click the links, hold trainings, and get this rolling. --David Swanson

Study Circles, Citizen's Assemblies, and  Social Media: A Civic Infrastructure for "Occupy Wall Street"
By "Prof"

In a speech at a National Civic League annual meeting, former U.S. Senator Bill Bradley described American society with a very interesting metaphor. According to Bradley, American society is like a three-legged stool. There is a government leg, a business leg, and a community leg. Bradley got the audience's attention by declaring that the government and business legs are very long, and the civil society leg is very short, making the stool--and the society--very unstable. [1]

I.               What's the problem? Where did it come from?

When Alexis DeTocqueville toured the United States after the American Revolution, he described an American society with a rich community life and a vibrant civil society. In fact, the civil society leg of the stool was much longer than the other two. But not for long.

The Civil War brought Northern manufacturing to a peak, and the country entered its industrial revolution soon after. By the late19th century, railroad and oil barons and bankers and their huge trusts exercised enormous influence, dwarfing civil society and the national government to Lilliputian proportions.

Such power needed to be checked, and by the early 20th century, "trust-busting" President Teddy Roosevelt began building the government regulatory system needed to do so. The 16th Amendment permitted the federal income tax, and the government leg began to grow to match the business leg.

Though slowed by the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress and President Franklin established the regulatory state by the end of World War II. The business collapse of the 1930s made their case.

With the government's help as well as its supervision, the business sector re-grew rapidly during and after World War II, and by the 1980s, was prepared to push back against government. At the time, the two were about evenly matched.

The "Reagan Revolution" reduced income tax revenues and reduced government regulation, weakening government except in the areas of private property protection at home and abroad. The pattern continues, with disastrous results for the environment, our standard of living, and our country's financial stability.

During this time, the civil society leg got shorter and shorter, and not only by comparison. The suburbanization waves after World War II broke up old neighborhoods in the cities. Stay-at-home Moms kept the patchwork together, until they began to return to the work force. Private sector unions grew weaker and weaker, buffeted by McCarthyism in the 1950s and the loss of the country's industrial job base to the developing world in the 1970s.

II.             What Solutions Are Not Working?

Government is increasingly less responsive to "ordinary" people and their concerns. Globe-trotting businesses and banks increasingly see consumers as commodities rather than members of a shared community.

On the community side, public sector unions are all that is left of the union movement, and they are under sustained attack. The episodic social movements of the 1960s and 1970s--civil rights, women's liberation--have come to focus more on inclusion in corporate society than on challenging it. Without a grass-roots organizational structure, the U.S. progressive movements remains easily co-opted or destabilized.

III.           What Can Be Tried That's New?

Our country needs a community-based "civic infrastructure" that is sufficiently strong and well-enough organized to provide a needed balance to business and government. Several models are available to accomplish this objective.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More-- The Indigenous People's Revolution Begins

"March Against Monsanto" Planned for Over 30 Countries

Bernie Sanders Blocks Bernanke Confirmation... With Bi-Partisan Support

Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture

Statement of 911 Widows In Response to 12/25 Terror Attempt

Occupy & Tea Party Join Forces to Protest NDAA

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
The idea of bottom-up, cascading assemblies is coo... by Don Smith on Tuesday, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:11:44 PM
Was it the Athenians that had a congress of 6000... by Thomas Brown on Wednesday, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:22:05 PM
With all due respect to "Prof," I have been stud... by Gary Brumback on Thursday, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17:52 AM