Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

In Defense of NPR

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 5   Must Read 4   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/19/11

- Advertisement -
This article was co-written by Michael Winship

Come on now: Let's take a breath and put this NPR fracas into perspective.


Just as public radio struggles against yet another assault from the its
long-time nemesis -- the right-wing machine that would thrill if our
sole sources of information were Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and ads paid
for by the Koch Brothers -- it walks into a trap perpetrated by one of
the sleaziest operatives ever to climb out of a sewer.



First, in the interest of full disclosure: While not presently
committing journalism on public television, the two of us have been
colleagues on PBS for almost 40 years (although never for NPR). We've
lived through every one of the fierce and often unscrupulous efforts by
the right to shut down both public television and radio. Our work has
sometimes been the explicit bull's eye on the dartboard, as conservative
ideologues sought to extinguish the independent reporting and analysis
they find so threatening to their phobic worldview.



Richard Nixon was the first who tried to shut down public broadcasting,
strangling and diverting funding, attacking alleged bias and even
placing public broadcasters on his legendary enemies list. Ronald Reagan
and Newt Gingrich tried to gut public broadcasting, too, and the George
W. Bush White House planted partisan operatives at the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting in an attempt to challenge journalists who didn't
hew to the party line.



But what's happening now is the worst yet. Just as Republicans again
clamor for the elimination of government funding and public broadcasting
once more fights for life, it steps on its own oxygen line. The details
are well-known: how NPR's development chief Ron Schiller stupidly fell
into a sting perpetrated by an organization run by the young
conservative hit man James O'Keefe, a product of that grimy underworld
of ideologically based harassment which feeds the right's slime machine.
Posing as members of a phony Muslim group, O'Keefe's agents
provocateurs offered NPR a check for $5 million -- an offer that was
rejected.



Unfortunately, Ron Schiller couldn't leave it there. Unaware that he
was speaking into a hidden camera and microphone, and violating
everything we're told from childhood about not talking to strangers, he
allowed the two co-conspirators to goad him into a loquacious display of
personal opinions -- although subsequent disclosure of the unedited tape
shows he was, to a large degree, quoted out of context.



Still, Schiller's a fundraiser, not a news director. NPR keeps a high,
thick firewall between its successful development office and its superb
news division. If you would see how this integrity is upheld, go to the
NPR website and pull up any of its reporting since 2009 on the Tea Party
movement. Further, examine how over the past few days NPR has covered
the O'Keefe/Schiller contretemps and made no attempt to cover up or
ignore its own failings and responsibilities.



Then reverse the situation and contemplate how, say, Fox News would
handle a similar incident if they were the target of a sting. Would
their coverage be as "fair and balanced" as NPR's? Would they apologize
or punish their outspoken employee if he or she demeaned liberals? Don't
kid yourself. A raise and promotion would be more likely. Remember what
Fox News chief Roger Ailes said about NPR executives after they fired
Fox contributor Juan Williams? "They are, of course, Nazis," Ailes told
an interviewer. "They have a kind of Nazi attitude. They are the left
wing of Nazism. These guys don't want any other point of view." When the
Anti-Defamation League objected to the characterization, Ailes
apologized but then described NPR as "nasty, inflexible" bigots.



Double standard? You bet. A fundraiser for NPR is axed for his own
personal bias and unprofessionalism but Ailes gets away scot free, still
running a news division that is constantly pumping arsenic into
democracy's drinking water while he slanders public radio as equal to
the monsters and murderers of the Third Reich.



Sure, public broadcasting has made its share of mistakes, and there
have been times when we who practice our craft under its aegis have been
less than stalwart in taking a stand and speaking truth to power. But
for all its flaws, consider an America without public media. Consider a
society where the distortions and dissembling would go unchallenged,
where fact-based reporting is eliminated, and where the field is
abandoned to the likes of James O'Keefe, whose "journalism" relies on
lying and deceit.



Come on, people: Speak up!
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

Bill Moyers is President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Moyers: Why Religion Should Not Dictate Our Politics

Ralph Reed: From Purgatory to Power

A Time for Heresy

Living Under the Gun

The Big Money Behind Netanyahu

In Defense of NPR

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

NPR once again acted as chief cheerleader of a new... by Peter Duveen on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:14:58 PM
merely pick up things now and then (when rollerbla... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:40:33 PM
I certainly sympathize with your dilemma, Daniel, ... by Eric Pottenger on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:26:52 PM
I sincerely hope the truth is stronger than lies. ... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:21:06 PM
Walter Lippmann is a powerful writer, he makes his... by Eric Pottenger on Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:06:20 AM
Any three of us could start an internet radio stat... by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:03:11 PM
I share your frustration with NPR. Its facinating ... by Ted Newcomen on Wednesday, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:31:47 AM
It saddens me to say it, but it has been a long ti... by Clark on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:37:34 PM
Clark, I could not have said it better. There must... by Peter Duveen on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:23:39 PM
Great post. NPR should not be allowed to die.I enj... by Steven G. Erickson on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:49:53 PM
NPR doesn't speak the truth, so its good that it i... by Saman Mohammadi on Saturday, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:56:41 PM
click hereThis story was the last straw. As of Thu... by BlessUsAll on Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:35:17 AM
To me, NPR is a seductive, highly-effective form o... by Eric Pottenger on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:09:39 AM
Eric took the words right out of my mouth. I know ... by Davey Jones on Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:46:04 AM
Political to an extreamist degree. They claim the... by Laura Roberts on Sunday, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:59:58 PM
damned if they don't....Disclaimer: I have been a... by Doc McCoy on Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:37:41 AM