Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 16, 2008 at 10:03:41

View Ratings | Rate It

Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win

by Dave Lindorff     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

By Dave Lindorff

There are two ways to view the news that the House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on impeachable crimes by President George W. Bush.

One view would be that this is all a charade and that after all, it will not be a real impeachment hearing, but rather, simply a hearing into the impeachable crimes of the Bush administration. As committee Chair Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) put it, “We’re not doing impeachment, but he [Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who introduced 36 articles of impeachment] can talk about it.” Viewed that way, this is not such a big deal. Rep. Kucinich gets to make his case that the president is committing high crimes and misdemeanors and abuses of power and war crimes, but then Congressional Democrats will continue to ignore all the crimes as it has done since taking control of Congress in November 2006.

But a second way to view this is as a significant victory over the quisling Congressional leadership, which has been ducking its responsibility to defend the Constitution and to stand up for the rule of law not just since November 2006, but since the inception of the Bush/Cheney presidency.

I go for the second interpretation of events. It is clear, as was beautifully laid out in an article published by Glenn Greenwald in Salon magazine on July 15, that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and the rest of the Democratic Party leadership both in Congress and in the party organization, have been blocking any action on impeachment for fear of having their own complicity in Bush's and Cheney's crimes revealed. As Greenwald notes, the Washington Post has reported that Pelosi, along with Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) were briefed on the administration's use of torture and not only didn't object, but actively encouraged it. Rockefeller and Harman, who at the time were minority leaders of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees at the time, were also briefed about Bush's order to the National Security Agency to conduct warrantless spying on Americans. They didn't object or publicly expose this blatant violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment. And of course, many, if not most of the House and Senate Democratic leadership as well as many of the rank-and-file members of the party in both houses backed Bush's illegal war on Iraq, and his USA PATRIOT Act.

No wonder Pelosi, even before winning control of Congress and being elected Speaker, made it clear that under her "leadership" (if it can be called that), impeachment of either Bush or Cheney would be "off the table."

Looked at in this light, the fact that the House just voted 251-166 to send Kucinich's 36 articles of impeachment to the Judiciary Committee for a hearing, that Pelosi has had to buckle, and that Conyers has agreed to hold even an "informational" hearing on impeachment, at which Kucinich, Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), and other impeachment advocates in the House will be able to present their case about the president's crimes and abuses of power, constitutes a major victory of principle over cowardice, of integrity over complicity, of the Constitution over creeping fascism. (24 Republicans joined in voting to send the articles to the committee.)

The fact is that public demands to hold this criminal administration accountable for its crimes against the Constitution, the American people and the global community, have been mounting and have reached a point that the Democratic leadership, as terrified as it is of impeachment and of the accompanying airing of its own complicity in those crimes, has been forced to allow an airing of those crimes.

Now I don't expect Rep. Kucinich to bite the hand that feeds him. He will not present the impeachment case in a way that criticizes those leaders. Indeed, he has publicly thanked both Pelosi and Conyers for allowing a hearing on impeachment. But it would be surprising if Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee didn't make those points. And that's good. Even if real impeachment hearings never actually come to pass, we will be treated, finally, to a public airing of not just the president's and vice president's crimes, but of the Democratic Party leadership's participation in them.

The challenge now will be for the American people and for the wide-spread and decentralized impeachment movement, and all progressive, anti-war and civil liberties organizations, to press Conyers and the Judiciary Committee to take it to the next level. If Kucinich, Wexler and others do their job, and if we all demand that the corporate media report on the hearings, Americans will finally know the extent of this administration's crimes against the Constitution, and the nature of the threat it poses to democracy and freedom in America. At that point it will be time to demand that the Judiciary Committee move to constitute itself as a formal Impeachment Committee, with full power to subpoena and demand the appearance of witnesses in a real impeachment hearing.

The hour is getting late, but there is still time to bring this criminal administration to justice.

American voters may forgive leaders like Pelosi, Harman, Rockefeller and others for failing to stand up to Bush and Cheney if their names get dragged through the mud of an impeachment hearing, but the American people will never forgive them or the rest of the Congress if it allows these two men to leave office next January without tar and feathers on their backs and a federal grand jury on their cases.

Call your representative today and every day (at 202-224-3121) and demand that he or she co-sponsor some or all of Rep. Kucinich's 36 bills of impeachment, and join the call for real impeachment hearings. Send them an email. And sign the petition calling for impeachment hearings.

We are witnessing a backdown by the House leadership. It's time to push harder. Impeachment hearings, and impeachment itself, can happen!
____________
DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006 and now available in paperback). His work is available at ThisCantBeHappening.net

digg_url = 'http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/34806'; digg_title = "Impeachment Hearings: A Win is a Win"; digg_bodytext = "By Dave Lindorff\r\n\r\n There are two ways to view the news that the House Judiciary Committee will be holding a hearing on impeachable crimes by President George W. Bush.\r\n\r\n One view would be that this is all a charade and that after all, it will not be a real impeachment hearing, but rather, simply a hearing into the impeachable crimes of the Bush administration. As committee Chair Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) put it, "We're not doing impeachment, but he [Rep. Dennis Kucinich, who introduced 36 articles of impeachment] can talk about it." Viewed that way, this is not such a big deal. Rep. Kucinich gets to make his case that the president is committing high crimes and misdemeanors and abuses of power and war crimes, but then Congressional Democrats will continue to ignore all the crimes as it has done since taking control of Congress in November 2006.\r\n\r"; digg_skin = 'standard';

 

http://www.thiscantbehappening.net

Dave Lindorff, a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy" and "Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal"). His (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Congress Democratic Hearings"
The implementation of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996: Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere of ... Congress, second session, July 11, 1996
by United States

$245.34

Number of pages: 76
Publisher: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office

Health care reform: Hearings before the Democratic Policy Committee, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, first and second sessions : field ... 12, 13, 1991 and January 27, 1992 (S. hrg)
by United States

$239.47

Number of pages: 688
Publisher: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office

The Chechen conflict and Russian democratic development: Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, March 6, 1996
by United States

$240.43

Number of pages: 32
Publisher: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office

Conduit payments to the Democratic National Committee: Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, One Hundred ... Congress, first session, October 9, 1997
by United States

$88.77

Number of pages: 422
Publisher: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments


Pelosi KNEW!! ... about the torture practices.

Here is a link to Glenn Greenwald's article:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/07/15/complicity/index.html 

There is an update (at link), following Jane Mayer's comments in WaPo.  She was asked, "Who specifically is compromised "who might ordinarily be counted on to lead the charge" -- Nancy Pelosi, Jane Harman, Jay Rockefeller? -- and how are they "compromised"?

Jane Mayer: The ranking members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees were briefed dozens of times about the CIA's interrogation and detention program over the past seven years -- so any member who has held one of those posts has arguably been complicit. Some say they tried to object, internally. But either because of the threat of violating national security, or, because of the fear of the political price of dissent, these figures in both parties would find it very hard at this point to point the finger at the White House, without also implicating themselves.

by Aurora (0 articles, 95 quicklinks, 52 diaries, 648 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:30:15 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Pelosi's "Reasons not to impeach" look different now

Remember those "Reasons not to impeach",  sent out via John Conyers?
Things like,  "People don't want it"  (hmm, which people don't want it?),  and "We could lose votes, or voters".  (Oh..  they may find their Rep has been complicit in implementing a program of torture?   And it is better to cover that up and hide it away?) 

"Impeachment is off the table"....  why, exactly?

Glenn Greenwald:
That's rather definitive. Nancy Pelosi, Jane Harman and Jay Rockefeller were all previous ranking members of the Intelligence Committee, all received these briefings, and were thus "compromised" and "complicit" in exactly the way that Mayer just described, because -- as Mayer put it -- they "would find it very hard at this point to point the finger at the White House, without also implicating themselves." That is one very significant reason why so many Congressional Democrats -- including the leadership -- are so supportive of immunity for Bush lawbreakers and the blocking of any investigations into the lawbreaking.

by Aurora (0 articles, 95 quicklinks, 52 diaries, 648 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:52:29 PM

Recommend  (0+)

A significant breakthrough - Yes.

"The fact is that public demands to hold this criminal administration accountable for its crimes against the Constitution, the American people and the global community, have been mounting and have reached a point that the Democratic leadership, as terrified as it is of impeachment and of the accompanying airing of its own complicity in those crimes, has been forced to allow an airing of those crimes."

For such a long time, the incremental changes in public consciousness, and in what is actually possible to achieve,  have seemed so small.  Now there is the possibility of significant change at a whole new level.

"If Kucinich, Wexler and others do their job, and if we all demand that the corporate media report on the hearings, Americans will finally know the extent of this administration's crimes against the Constitution, and the nature of the threat it poses to democracy and freedom in America."

Not sure about being able to "demand" corp media reports..  They have so much power, don't they?   A bit of a stranglehold over what the general public are "allowed" to see or even to think about.  However even there, change is slowly taking place. 

"At that point it will be time to demand that the Judiciary Committee move to constitute itself as a formal Impeachment Committee, with full power to subpoena and demand the appearance of witnesses in a real impeachment hearing."   (emph added)

by Aurora (0 articles, 95 quicklinks, 52 diaries, 648 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:48:40 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Can't get to the impeachment petition

This is the second article that I looked at about impeachment.  When I click on the sign the petition it won't go there.  Just thought I would let these authors know that.

by Lindiana (2 articles, 2 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 49 comments) on Monday, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:20:56 AM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

McKinney Relocated from Israeli Prison by Meryl Ann Butler

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum