Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 21, 2008 at 10:40:37

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 6/21/08:
Impeach, Convict, Imprison, Sue

by johnneale     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

Vincent Bugliosi, the prosecutor who won the conviction of Charles Manson, wants to try George W. Bush in criminal court for the murder of 4000 people, in his new book The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder

I think that is a fine idea.  Everyone should sue the President of the United States (POTUS).  I would like to expand on the notion, and suggest that as many people as possible file civil lawsuits seeking damages for what this president has done to us as individual Americans. 

I have suffered real anguish over our loss of national esteem.  I have suffered real embarrassment, shame, and/or humiliation due to this man's policies, speeches, and pandering.  I have suffered financial loss through his incompetence, from his giveaways to the rich and powerful, and from the ridiculously high level of war profiteering and official corruption associated with the "war" in Iraq. 

I can't put a price tag on the erosion of my rights, from loss of habeas corpus to the agony of not knowing if my phone is tapped, but I would be willing to try!

 

Austin computer geek and Buddatarian

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments


Not a bad idea

It certainly is nice to think the Bush family could end up living on the street, where it has put so many others.

by Roger (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 465 comments [22 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:40:40 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Or in prison

where they belong

by Rady Ananda (182 articles, 374 quicklinks, 49 diaries, 1718 comments [201 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 6:47:24 PM

Recommend  (0+)

WITHOUT THAT PEACHY IMMINENT THEN HOW ABOUT

fighting in the streets and mayhem because

 
Why attack Iran's nuclear facilities when striking their oil infrastructure would be much more effective in the scope of a US-led preventive war?   
 Sure, oil prices might skyrocket and the world economy might collapse. But, hey, that's the price you pay for security.  
  
Such a scenario is not a nightmare or an outtake from a remake of Stanley Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove," but part of a serious recommendation  
made by two neoconservatives in case sanctions fail to persuade Iran to abandon its enrichment of uranium, a process that can be used to   
 make nuclear weapons or fuel for peaceful energy production.  
  
In a July report titled "The Last Resort: Consequences of Preventive Military Action Against Iran," and published by the neoconservative   
 Washington Institute for Near East Studies, scholars Patrick Clawson and Michael Eisenstadt advocate military strategies that would   
 ultimately discourage Tehran from pursuing any future non-civilian nuclear activities:  
  
Because the ultimate goal of prevention is to influence Tehran to change course, effective strikes against Iran's nuclear infrastructure may   
 play an important role in affecting Iran's decision calculus. Strikes that flatten its nuclear infrastructure could have a demoralizing effect,  
 and could influence Tehran's assessment of the cost of rebuilding. But the most effective strikes may not necessarily be against nuclear  
 facilities. Iran is extraordinarily vulnerable to attacks on its oil export infrastructure.... The political shock of losing the oil income could   
cause Iran to rethink its nuclear stance—in ways that attacks on its nuclear infrastructure might not.  
  
And if an attack on the oil facilities of a country with some of the world's largest reserves leads to a huge spike in oil prices, sends gas prices  
up to 10 bucks a gallon and brings economic ruin in the rest of the world, the report continues, well, so be it:  
  
To be sure, in a tight world oil market, attacking Iran's oil infrastructure carries an obvious risk of causing world oil prices to soar and hurting   
consumers in the United States and other oil-importing countries.... If the choice is between higher oil prices and a Middle East with several   
nuclear powers, higher oil prices and reduced economic growth are not clearly the greater evil.  
 

by Wolfie (9 articles, 0 quicklinks, 33 diaries, 1208 comments) on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:55:25 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: I vote mayhem

the eco-destruction that would ensue from bombing Iran's oil infrastructure is horrific, beyond the horrific death toll of innocents. 

by Rady Ananda (182 articles, 374 quicklinks, 49 diaries, 1718 comments [201 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:37:22 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Great Idea..but I think

we'll have to start with impeaching Congress first..... 

by Susan Nelsen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 287 comments) on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:25:28 PM

Recommend  (0+)

A way to get the bad apples out of Congress

Would be to expose their voting records, individually and collectively.

Let's send emails, post to blogs and websites, and write letters to the editor. I would think that when people know whodunnit, that would help to get them ousted.

But we've got to keep it up and we've got to be vigilant, and we can't do it alone.

Let's recruit lots of help to do this, asking other on-line activists to join forces with us in a steady, ongoing informational avalanche of voting record information.

Then we'll see them out of office, and the clean-up work can begin (Campaign finance reform, restoring the COnstitution, etc).

 Thank you all!!!

by Kathryn Smith (110 articles, 2 quicklinks, 43 diaries, 542 comments [23 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:39:10 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: CONGRESS IS OUT TO LUNCH, BE BACK AFTER MARTIAL LAW.

WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? IT IS TOO LATE. GET THE MOP OUT AND

WASH THE BLOOD AWAY. We had a coup by the Supremes. Since then

we are crying in our soup!

by Wolfie (9 articles, 0 quicklinks, 33 diaries, 1208 comments) on Sunday, Jun 22, 2008 at 8:49:31 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

REPORTING FROM HONDURAS: Hondurans Call Out for Help from the International Community by Medea Benjamin

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Italy to Declare Independence from U.S. Military by David Swanson

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum