Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

If You Supported the No Fly Zone, Time to Reconsider

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/24/11

Become a Fan
  (57 fans)
(*Editor's Note: There are no USMC expeditionary forces on the ground in Libya. This is a misunderstanding on the part of the author based on an erroneous link that OpEdNews needs to correct. The USS Kearsarge normally carries a compliment of Marines aboard in potential combat zones. The 26th MEU consists of four components: a ground combat element, a command element, an aviation combat element, and a logistics element. The 26th MEU has only provided logistics support and launched aviation missions thus far. All of these missions were launched from the USS Kearsarge more than 100 nautical miles from the coast. Other than the small TRAP force sent to locate the Air Force pilots (who bailed out when their jet went down-MM), no U.S. Marines from the 26th MEU have landed ashore. (source). Mac McKinney, editor)


The Attack on Libya is Not Merely a No Fly Zone--But an Intervention Into Libya

By Kevin Zeese

It was hard for some peace activists to look at the planned attack by Col. Gadhafi on Libyan rebels and oppose the no fly zone approved by the U.N.   Col. Gadhafi is a vicious leader who promised to make the streets run red with blood so this was an issue that divided the peace community.  

Regardless of how you felt about the original no fly zone, how you feel about the Gadhafi regime or the armed rebels fighting it, we should all recognize that the United States, United Kingdom and France are going further than a no fly zone and are intervening in a civil war for their own reasons that have nothing to do with defending democracy or other humanitarian goals.   Already we are seeing evidence of the broader mission beyond a no fly zone and beyond what President Obama said would be a few days with no troops on the ground.

-          - While in Egypt this week Secretary Gates hinted that the war in Libya may be open-ended.

-          - There is confusion about the goals in Libya.   Does it include removal of Gadhafi as President Obama and Secretary Clinton have said? Putting in place a democracy?   Reaching those goals is beyond the UN mandate and will get the U.S. into another quagmire.

-          - While President Obama promised no troops on the ground in Libya, there are reports that there are already 2,000 marines on the ground in Libya.

-          - Special Forces are developing a role in Libya.   Even before the UN resolution there were reports of U.S. "advisors" on the ground in Libya in early March and Special Forces fighting with rebels in late February, a month before the mandate.

-           The U.S. is planning on sending National Guard troops to Libya. Is a longer war planned than has been admitted?

-           It is becoming more evident that this is a foreign intervention into a civil war and we've had enough experience with that to know that it will not end well. And, there is strong evidence that if this is not already one, it will become a civil war because of foreign intervention.

-          - Due to the expansion of the attack beyond a no fly zone, which the Arab League originally called for, the Arab League now opposes the intervention because it is not a legitimate "no fly zone." As the Arab League president said, "What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians."

-          - The "hidden agenda" of oil is rearing its ugly head again.   Would the U.S. be in Libya if it produced asparagus?   Why isn't the U.S. opposing dictators in Bahrain, Yemen and Saudi Arabia? Now that the Libyan Air Force has been made unable to fight, what is the purpose of the ongoing bombardment?

-          - And, how many civilians will the U.S. kill to save civilians from being killed?   Already there are reports of widespread civilian deaths as well as mistaken civilian deaths. Secretary Gates' denial of civilian deaths are hard to believe when nearly 200 missiles have been launched into Libya.

The Libyan attack raises a persistent issue in U.S. foreign policy.   The U.S. trained the Libyan military and provided them with weapons, including $15 million in arms sales in FY 2009 alone.   Now the U.S. military is destroying that same military and the weapons the U.S. sold them.   Should the U.S., the largest arms merchant in the world which sells nearly 70% of all weapons, be selling weapons to despots, dictators and royalists who do not have the support of their people?   Doesn't this ensure rebellions seeking democracy will be met with lethal force and the U.S. may need to intervene for "humanitarian" reasons? President Obama has produced record arms sales, in particular the largest arms sale in history to one country with $60 billion in sales to Saudi Arabia, another unpopular regime among its people.

Finally, the Constitutional issue of unilateral military attacks on countries that are not a threat to the United States was violated by the attack on Libya and needs to be faced up to.   When he was running for office, candidate Obama correctly said : "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."   James Madison, the father of the U.S. Constitution wrote in 1795 that Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which put the power to declare war and fund war in the hands of the legislature, was the most important clause of the constitution. "The Constitution expressly and exclusively vests in the Legislature the power of declaring a state of war [and] the power of raising armies. A delegation of such powers [to the president] would have struck, not only at the fabric of our Constitution, but at the foundation of all well organized and well checked governments. The separation of the power of declaring war from that of conducting it, is wisely contrived to exclude the danger of its being declared for the sake of its being conducted."

The founders had seen monarchs unilaterally declare war resulting in mass deaths and economic ruin.   Indeed, the U.S. with an already fragile economy and stretched thin military faces those risks with the Libyan war.   Already the U.S. has used more than 150 Tomahawk Cruise missiles against Libya, each one costing $1.5 million.   On the first day the U.S. spent an estimated $100 million on the Libyan attack.   And, people are estimating that the U.S. will spend $1 billion in Libya in a very short time.   This will all be borrowed money and comes at a time when austerity measures are being put in place by state and federal governments cutting basic services.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.ItsOurEconomy.us and http://www.ComeHomeAmerica.U

Kevin Zeese is co-chair of Come Home America, www.ComeHomeAmerica.US which seeks to end U.S. militarism and empire. He is also co-director of Its Our Economy, www.ItsOurEconomy.US which seeks to democratize the economy and give people greater (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why I Was Among Eight Health Care Advocates to Get Arrested in the Senate Yesterday

The Seeds of Rebellion Are Taking Root, and Protests Against Injustices Are Blooming Across the Country

BREAKING NEWS: BIG BREAKTHROUGHS FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE

Ron Paul Press Conference Unifies Third Party and Independent Candidates Around Four Key Positions

Paperless Electronic Voting Machines Flipping Votes from Obama to McCain in West Virginia

Election Theft for 2008 Already Underway

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks for making the needed correction. To take ... by Doc McCoy on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:17:28 PM
It was widely reported that the Brits had some ope... by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:54:24 PM
operatives are not considered to be the same as "b... by Doc McCoy on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:10:46 PM
for the corrections. I find it always a very good... by Laura Roberts on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:33:35 PM
It may be an act of war to declare the removal of ... by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:01:10 PM
First of all - the US does not apologize to anyone... by Doc McCoy on Thursday, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:29:10 PM