Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  1
1 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

If Health Reform Fails: Insurers' Double-0 “License to Kill”

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 11/19/09
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

opednews.com

<

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced last night that he is ready to bring a health care reform bill to the Senate floor for debate as early as Saturday (November 21). This can only mean that Reid thinks he has the 60 votes needed to block a Republican filibuster against introducing the bill.

While we do not yet know the horse-trading needed to get all 60 members of the Democratic caucus to support the bill, it's probably safe to say that Progressives will be disappointed. There is still talk among some Progressives of withdrawing support for the bill entirely; so far does the bill depart from their vision of what true progressive health reform should be.

While the bill may not contain everything, or even much of what we would like, I believe it deserves our support. As the Happy Warrior, Hubert Humphrey himself said, "If you can't get a whole loaf, take half a loaf."

Just don't give us crumbs. We can always go back later for improvements, for more of the loaf. But if the bill fails, it may take another 15 years before we can go back to the table at all.

That brings up a subject that deserves more discussion than it has gotten so far: what will happen if health care reform fails in the Senate (or, later, in the full Congress)?

Advocates for health care reform point out how inefficient, costly, and unfair the current system is, and point to those problems as reasons enough to effect change.

Opponents fixate on the cost of reform, on hot-button labels like socialism, and on outright lies (death panels, government takeover, etc.) They seem to hope that if health care fails, the status quo will somehow be restored, their money will not be spent on somebody else's care, and everything will get back to normal.

They may not especially like that "normal" -- with 46 million Americans uninsured, 45,000 deaths a year, twice-inflation premium increases, denial of coverages, and more -- but it's a normal they know and understand.

There is a big surprise in store for those people, and it will not be a surprise they like: Whatever else happens, the status quo is not coming back.

If health reform fails, within five years, I believe we will all look back on the last decade in health care as "the good old days."

And Democrats will get the lion's share of the blame in 2010 and 2012 for failing to pass health care reform legislation in 2009.

If health reform fails, I think we will see dramatic increases in health insurance premiums starting in 2010. "Health insurances prices were going to go up anyway," opponents will say. "Prices always go up. We expected that."

Not like this. Here's why. The health insurance lobby has spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to defeat health care reform. If they succeed, they will want to get their money back fast. And they will get it back -- from you.

That's not all. All this talk about reform has increased the systematic risk of being in the health insurance business. And that is risk for which companies demand to be paid. After all, most health insurance companies are not in the health care business; they are in the insurance business. They get paid to produce healthy balance sheets, not healthy people.

Premiums will zoom out of control for still another reason: insurance companies will raise prices because they can; because our Congress members let them. If the measures that would control industry revenues and profits -- including a robust public option -- are defeated, then there will be no competitive control, and little statutory control, on insurance company revenues and profits for the foreseeable future.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments