Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

I screamed at the radio when I heard Todd Akin [R-MO] say...

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Halloween came early this year, when Republican incumbent Congressman Todd Akin [D-MO] treated midwest radio listeners to a 30-minute interview on St. Louis Public Radio on Oct. 4. I'm glad he was on the show, because it's important that people actually hear what he says, and get the "logic" behind his ideas. Many of his statements were the expected Republican boilerplate. But some of what he said was disturbingly illogical and extreme, but perhaps not as extreme as some of the ideas he expresses on his website, particularly his website pronouncements about the role of prayer in making our country better. I wonder if his constituents are fully aware of these views. If they aren't, and if we all aren't, we need to pay better attention.

The lack of compassion is astonishing, particularly in the notion that charity is the way to solve the problem of uninsured Americans. [The excerpts are nearly verbatim from the radio interview.]

Driving with my windows open on a beautiful fall day, I'm sure that I startled several other drivers with my shrieks when I heard him say"

On Washington, DC

"[That I'm]"happy to be out of Washington is always a safe assumption." [Author's comment: Larry from South St. Louis, whoever you are, thank you for calling in and reminding Congressman Akin that he has a job to do in Washington that we pay him for.]

On healthcare reform

"In the last election the Democrats took an overwhelming majority of everything, so there's not the normal buffering that goes on." [Author's comment: The party of no made sure that "buffering" actually did take place.]

"Because the Democrats had a wide open playing field, they did what they wanted to do"You see extreme practices coming from the Democrat side"The idea of the Federal Government running health care. That's a pretty extreme policy."

"If Medicare and Medicaid are broken are we gonna turn the rest of health care over to the government?"

"Republicans believe that the private system is better. There certain have to be patches and fixes". We passed a number of proposals to improve health care when we had the majority"Don't scrap the whole thing and give it to the government to run."

"..If you're just a responsible guy"you're a good citizen [author's emphasis] and bought health insurance, and then you become uninsurable because someone in your family gets a pre-existing condition--in a few years you're bankrupt"The best way to approach is to prevent more people from falling into that trap of not being insured."

"Charity: that's the way they were always paid for in the past. The big tycoons originally built the hospitals. There's still a lot of charity, but it's being laundered through the government"The most efficient way to cover poverty is by charity. The government [can't] step in to take care of people's food, shelter, education and health care. Across the ocean, the government tried it and the Soviet Union eventually collapsed. We can't afford that. You can't cheat mathematics" The government can't provide perfect healthcare for everyone and housing and food and provide for the national defense. [We need to think about] what government should do, and what should go back to the states and local."

On President Obama

"I think [describing President Obama] as a socialist is a bland description. Obama said he was a socialist when he talked to Joe the Plumber. He said that it's the federal government's job to redistribute wealth""

On Social Security and on paying for health care via charity

"Politically, I think Social Security will be given more to the people who are more needy. And people who have others forms of security won't get it . I don't like it"I would prefer that we allow incentives for people to save on their own. At a minimum, if you have Social Security, let the money that people put in, let that be indexed to those people, so they own some of what they're investing. As opposed to giving it irresponsibly to government and they spend it all and then spend ourselves into a box like we're doing now."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.occasionalplanet.org

Gloria Bilchik is a freelance writer based in St. Louis, Missouri. She is co-founder of Occasional Planet, a progressive blog focused on positive developments in government, creative thinking on current issues, and progressive people, programs and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You don't have to dabble in witchcraft to have scary ideas by gloria bilchik on Friday, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:42:18 AM
Lights are on but nobody's home by Wayne Turner on Friday, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:39:31 PM