Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   10 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

How 'bout that Tea Party

By       Message Jack Flash     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 69913
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -

First, we have to understand that, despite the name, it is not a political party. The Tea Party has no conventions, no primaries, and no place on voting ballots. So, can they be classed with Independents? I don't think so. Their members, if that term even applies, run on the Republican ticket and caucus with the Republicans. OK, are they an arm of the Republican Party? Possibly, but on many of their blogs, they are criticizing the Republicans for not being conservative enough.  


Picture worth a thousand misspelled words by Jack Flash
 

Well, how about a political movement? Webster's on-line Dictionary defines a political movement:

Noun 1. political movement -- a group of people working together to achieve a political goal. OK, maybe we have a winner here. They are a group of people, from their rallies and blogs, they are working together, and they have a political goal. Or do they?  

When I read their blogs I see one goal repeated over and over -- emphatically, venomously, and hatefully -- "Get rid of Obama." In the House debate over the debt ceiling, their goal was not to find a solution and pass a bill, but to shut down the process. So, is obstructing the process really a goal that can be defined?  

From Webster's on line Dictionary: Obstructionist...
1. Someone who systematically obstructs some action that others want to take.[Wordnet]
2. One who hinders progress; one who obstructs business, as in a legislative body.[Websters]

- Advertisement -


Now we have a definition for the Tea Party: An Obstructionist Movement.  

Lets take a look at a little history of the Tea Party Movement. The Tea Party started coming together as a reaction to the election of President Obama and the Democratic Congress. The first I heard of this movement was from local people here in West Georgia and East Alabama on a local conservative Southern blog during Obama's campaign. This was before the term Tea Party was coined. "We don't need no n****r in the White House." They were making all sorts of predictions like riots in the streets by blacks, white discrimination and an Islamic takeover of America if he was elected. After the election, their racism and phobias really shined, and I got banned for disagreeing. So much for free speech...  

Then Sarah Palin and the uneducated hate-filled pundits like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh went to work, and the hate movement was founded. You have to understand here that nothing moves people to act more than hate and fear, which is exactly what the pundits and self-proclaimed leaders of the Tea Party played on. Fear that a black President would
dislodge them as the dominant race, fear of Islamic terrorism promoted by the "Muslim" President. The only thing we have to fear is ... the fear of the Tea Party.  

The Tea Party is fueled by conspiracy theories promoted by far-right pundits and these theories spread like wildfire on their blogs and hate web sites. Lies, unfounded accusations, exaggerations -- all copied and pasted on hundreds upon hundreds of blogs until a Google search brings back thousands of hits for any one of them -- giving the appearance of
legitimacy. A lie, repeated over and over enough times, becomes truth. So, now, in their minds, we have a black Muslim president who was born in a foreign Islamic country, whose goal is to make America a Muslim nation. And from there, it all goes downhill.  

Then, in the 2010 elections we saw the results of the Supreme Court ruling that gives corporations the right to input hundreds of millions of dollars into campaign advertising, anonymously; and it wasn't a pretty sight. You see, somewhere along the way corporate America got on the bandwagon with financial support for the Tea Party Movement. Of course, this is in their best interest; after all, the Tea Party supports lower taxes for the wealthy and big corporations. More Tea Party candidates in political offices translates to more money in their bank accounts.  

It's no coincidence that the values of the Tea Party movement are the same as the goals of big corporations, big bankers and Wall Street investors. The fact that the Tea Partiers themselves are being screwed by the very agenda they promote is irrelevant; they are blinded by the hate and fear that has been instilled in the heart of the movement itself. 

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

At 63, I've lived through 12 Presidents, 6 Democrats and 6 Republicans and I'm pretty liberal in politics and in life. I grew up in Georgia, graduated from high school, spent 2 years on a Navy ship then began my life. During the late 60s and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Cognitive Impairment and Belief

The Tea Party, Chicken Little and the Mob Mentality

How 'bout that Tea Party

Working For The Mob - Tea Party Candidates