 |
|
Add to My Group
|
November 14, 2008 at 07:22:49
How International Bankers Gained Control of America & Why Lincoln Capitulated to that bunch by Greg Bacon Page 1 of 3 page(s) |
|
|
4
2
2
Whoever steps forward to take on that pit of vipers known as the Fed is on a suicide mission. Obama could go the route of that carpenter from Nazareth that kicked the moneychangers out of the Temple and was killed for his efforts. Or he could take the route of President Andy Jackson, who closed down the 2nd National Bank of the US and got shot for his efforts, but not killed. Or President Lincoln, who was opposed to an Independent US Treasury, but refused to pay usurious rates to finance the Civil War, so he printed US greenbacks.
Murdered by an assassin's bullet.
Or President Kennedy, who printed US government currency, around 4 billion dollars worth, money which LBJ took out of circulation after Johnson took over after JFK was murdered by an assassin.
You can either take an axe to cut out the cancer infecting America or go about that job with the deft hands of a surgeon using a scalpel. Either way, whoever takes on the task is going to have a bulls eye on their back.
How International Bankers Gained Control of America
From a Video Script Produced by Patrick S. J. Carmack
Directed by Bill Still
Royalty Production Company 1998
[QUOTE]
One month after the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the first shots of the American Civil War were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12,1861. ...
Certainly slavery was a cause for the Civil War, but not the primary cause. Lincoln knew that the economy of the South depended upon slavery and so (before the Civil War) he had no intention of eliminating it. Lincoln had put it this way in his inaugural address only one month earlier:
"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
Even after the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter, Lincoln continued to insist that the Civil War was not about the issue of slavery:
"My paramount objective is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it."
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 5 comments |
|
Choice tidbits
Thanks Greg for posting about those poignant episodes in history. The only weapon we have against the money power is knowledge and numbers, so I hope this article prompts more people to delve into the nature and history of money and banking. For as I quoted in a comment on another thread, " 'Power! Power comes in two forms: Organized people and organized money.' To govern ourselves, power is what we need. To get it we must want it and we must organize for it."* *"A Call to Citizens: Real Populists Please Stand Up!" by Ronnie Duggar,at www.thealliancefordemocracy.org/html/eng/1270-AA.shtml, Reprinted from "The Nation", August 14/21, 1995. Still totally relevant and worth reading! by Jim Eldon (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 253 comments [15 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:59:58 AM  (0+)
|
|
! . . . almost always remain nameless!"
No they don't. - Rothschild. Rothschild. Rothschild! by Keith Pope (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 96 comments [29 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:05:10 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: I've recently heard some frightening things about these
Rothschilds, namely, that they not only own the Bank of England, but also that there is some sort of franchising system in place that forces reserve banks around the world to pay regular dues to them. In other words, the interest Americans pay to the Fed for the use of the money the Fed has printed over the years, a bill which, I understand, is now about three-quarters of a trillion dollars per year (raised through the illegal income tax), not only goes to the American banks that own the Fed, but, in part, also to the Rothschilds in England. Or is the mechanism that they own part of the American banks (perhaps through ostensibly arm's length interposed entities)? Does anyone know? In Australia also, the constitution and operations of the Reserve Bank of Australia are never talked about, never dissected in public. Sydney, Australia by Robert Hoogenboom (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 234 comments [14 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:22:12 PM (0+)
|
|
FED
'The Secrets of the Federal Reserve'--Mullens 'The Coming Battle'--ebook available free The Creature From Jekyll Island--Griffith Alex Jones has a lot of info on his Prison Planet site Or just Google Rothscild! by William Whitten (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 4880 comments [1686 recommended, 28 rejected]) on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:47:31 PM (0+)
|
|
Web of Debt
Also read Web of Debt at www.webofdebt.com. You can download a pdf there for $10.00. by Patrick Sinnott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments) on Friday, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:13:49 PM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
