Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/26/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (15 comments)

How Goes the Battle Under Obama

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

PAYING TRIBUTE TO PRESIDENTIAL ACCOMPLISHMENT

By the end of this summer, I expect that President Obama will have a rather impressive set of achievements to show for his first year and a half in office.

He'll have gotten the Recovery Act through, and brought the economy through its darkest time in three generations.

He'll have managed to snatch victory from defeat's proverbial jaws, in a most impressive way, in getting health care reform passed.

By then I expect that he'll have gotten a decent financial regulation reform measure enacted.

And I also expect that by then he'll have placed two justices --humane and excellent-- on the Supreme Court bench.


Maybe there will be other accomplishments too --like on energy and climate change-- but I'm not expecting much else by that time. (And I'm not going to address here any of those matters of policy where he has NOT accomplished the kind of change the country needs.)

This is a set of accomplishments worth paying tribute to. I am glad to applaud this accomplishment: Obama has been tackling important problems, he's been patient and persistent, and he seems to keep managing to squeak through to victory.

If he were to serve another two and a half years achieving things at this rate --and even more so if he were to continue to achieve things at this rate for another six and a half years-- he would have far more to show for his time in office than most other presidents have.

It's unlikely, though, that he'll be able to continue this important repair work at this pace. For one thing, at the moment it looks quite possible that he'll cease to have the strength in Congress he'd need to be able to continue moving the ball forward. And while this is the usual pattern in American history for midterms after a presidential election, I believe it was not necessary for the prospects for Obama and his allies to be so precarious at this point.

I've addressed this issue many times here over recent months, but I want now to reiterate some of that, and also to articulate some new relevant points.

THE SPIRITUAL BATTLE GOVERNS THE POLITICAL BATTLE

The essential nature of the battle in America today is --as I've often declared-- more spiritual than political. It is in the political realm that the forces of evil have lately made a bold move (unprecedented in American history in its audacity and in the depth of its threat to what's most valuable in America) to control this country. And it is the battle between good and evil that must be won.

Politics, therefore, is more the battlefield than it is the basic stake in the war being fought. Obama has directed his efforts at the political arena, and there he has racked up important political accomplishments. But he has not seemed inclined to wage the spiritual war. And this is the reason, I believe, that his and his party's position is presently so precarious.

Two caveats here.

First, it should be recognized that every political battle that Obama wins has an influence on the correlation of forces in the deeper war. Everything he does that brings him and his party credit in the eyes of the people helps weaken the forces of evil. That's true because his accomplishments have been basically for the good. But it's also true because the public rewards winners and punishes losers, often independently of the merits of what the winners and losers have been fighting for.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If Obama is averse to conflict AND by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:10:33 AM
What does it mean to say someone lacks moral courage? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:16:49 PM
The corporate progs by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:02:47 PM
Rage, Despondence and agitation--wages of leftist purity by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:34:41 PM
Obama, Liberal? by Linda Ferland on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:18:50 PM
Are we taking responsibility for side? by Contextnow on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:17:19 PM
Positively to the media? by Linda Ferland on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:12:23 PM
thank you for your thoughtful reply by Contextnow on Tuesday, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:12:01 PM
Reply to Sam by Linda Ferland on Wednesday, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:15:47 PM
dems and gop are 1 party? by Contextnow on Wednesday, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:10:08 PM
1 Party by Linda Ferland on Wednesday, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:49:39 PM
oops by Contextnow on Thursday, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:40:36 PM
Re: oops by Linda Ferland on Thursday, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:10:49 PM
Friends by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Wednesday, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:53:37 PM
Excellent comments, Andy by Contextnow on Thursday, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:08:32 PM