Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Holder's Latest Lies Obscured by Syria

By       Message Barry Sussman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   News 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 9/16/13

- Advertisement -

Attorney General Eric Holder, in what was widely reported by the fawning American press as an "historic announcement," admitted much of what critics of the Department of Justice (DOJ) have long asserted. Holder, in a speech given before the American Bar Association on August 12, 2013, acknowledged that America's rate of incarceration is unprecedented and unjust. Specifically, he said the U.S. prison population was "outsized and unnecessarily large." His comments continued with the observation that "Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long and for no truly good law enforcement reason. We cannot simply prosecute or incarcerate our way to becoming a safer country."

Holder also acknowledged the pernicious effects of mass incarceration. "Today, a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality, and incarceration traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities. However, many aspects of our criminal justice system may actually exacerbate this problem, rather than alleviate it." The speech went on to cite "unduly harsh sentences" and referred to mandatory minimums within the current federal sentencing scheme as "draconian." 

by google images


Attorney General Eric Holder garnered maximum publicity with a meaningless policy announcement    


- Advertisement -

Holder's comments were met with near universal praise from across the political spectrum. "It is potentially a very significant shift in policy," said Bill Piper, the director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, a progressive group advocating the legalization marijuana.  "And one that would save taxpayers money and increase public safety." 


by google images


Drug advocate Bill Piper was quick to applaud Holder's announcement

- Advertisement -

"It's a step in the right direction, though about five years too late," says Grover Norquist, the anti-tax president of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform.  "Does it make sense to have a 70-year-old bank robber still in prison?  At what point does keeping a guy in prison actually help?  You want people in prison because they're a threat to others, not because you're mad at them." 

by google images


Grover Norquist met Holder's alleged policy change with measured praise


Holder's comments did not simply identify ills within the federal criminal justice system; specific policy changes were announced. Under the new policy, judges are alleged to have more leeway when sentencing nonviolent drug offenders without ties to large-scale organizations, gangs and drug cartels.  If a defendant is charged with selling a controlled substance, they can be charged based on the nature of their crime and not forced to serve a mandatory minimum.  There is currently a five year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of as little as 28 grams of crack cocaine.

Despite the predictable laudatory comments from Holder's media myrmidons, a closer examination of exactly what is being proposed reveals the inconsequential nature of the changes. Holder's announcement vests federal prosecutors with a wider range of discretion in the charging of drug offenders. Those "with no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs or cartels" are now to be free of exposure to mandatory minimum sentencing. Part of the problem with Holder's change is that this is exactly the sort of discretionary power that federal prosecutors have systematically abused. After all, what constitutes a "tie" to a drug organization or gang? These changes will most likely be used by prosecutors as an added inducement to turn those seeking leniency into cooperating witnesses against others and thus fuel the cycle of "snitching" that provides the backbone of the federal criminal justice system. Federal prosecutors can be reliably counted upon to assert their pathological belief that "power not abused is power unused." 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Well Said 3   News 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Barry Scott Sussman- Born and raised in New Jersey. Graduated from Rutgers University with a BA in Sociology. Graduated with a JD from the Benjamin Cardozo School of Law specializing in Federal Criminal Procedure and Federal Prosecutorial (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Many Convicted Felons are there in the U.S? It's a Mystery

The Sociopathy of Chris Christie

Edward Snowden's Unmasking of American Illegitimacy

Recent Cases Highlight Rampant Prosecutorial Misconduct

Abu Ghraib Whistleblower Receives Multiple Life Sentences

The Pathology of Prosecution: a Broken System of Justice