Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Hitchhiking Across the Plain of Megiddo

By       Message Bob Alexander     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 5/13/13

Author 71645
Become a Fan
  (49 fans)
- Advertisement -



I've always liked the following snippet of purple prose...
"Before the beginning, after the great war between heaven and hell, God created the Earth and gave dominion over it to the crafty ape he called man" and to each generation was born a Creature of Light and a Creature of Darkness" and great armies clashed by night in the ancient war between good and evil. There was magic then. Nobility. And unimaginable cruelty. And so it was until the day that a false sun exploded over Trinity, and man forever traded away wonder for reason." -- Season One opening narration from the HBO series Carnivale
I don't buy into the "god" part, heaven and hell, or the idea that after the bomb humanity embraced reason. But the seemingly forever war of Good vs. Evil ... resonates.

For the last week I've tried to jettison some words from my day-to-day vocabulary. Old habits die hard but the mind experiment is interesting. Try it yourself. For one week don't use these words:

Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Conservative, Right Wing, Left Wing, or any other label like Left of Center, Center, or Right of Center. Get rid of all quasi-political descriptors. Because they don't really work anymore. They're not very accurate or applicable. If I needed you to take care of my dog you'd need to know if I was talking about a Great Dane or a Chihuahua. Just saying "dog" isn't good enough. These days our political labels don't really tell us anything. And while we're at it let's get rid of all the "-ists" and "-isms." Socialism/Socialist, Communism/Communist, Capitalism/Capitalist, and Fascism/Fascist, are so emotionally charged some of us can't think straight when they're plopped into a conversation.

Now that we've got those words out of the way ... let's perform another mind experiment. Let's design A New Society. Not an over-reaching Utopia ... just a place where you'd like to live. What would make up the basic foundation of such a place? Where to start?
- Advertisement -


We begin with the environment. We know it's stupid to damage the resources we depend on to survive. We would all agree not to poison the air, water, or land. We won't poison our food. If or when we find out that some of the things we do harms the environment ... we don't "regulate" those activities ... we stop doing them.

If we have to trade our time, labor, and autonomy away for a job, then that job must pay a living wage and be a safe place to work.

We believe everyone needs the basic necessities in order to have a good life. Now we have to define what that means. Health Care. Not access to Health Care -- Health Care. We need good schools for our kids from pre-school to college. Public Housing isn't interchangeable with "slum" and Public Transportation means we could leave the car at home without being penalized by waiting interminably at a bus stop.

We'll also need libraries, firefighters, cops, garbage haulers, and museums. And all these things are essentially free.

We don't have to start from scratch. Just Google "Free Public Housing" or "Free public transport" and you'll find cities all over Europe that have implemented these things. Bill O'Reilly and other media gasbags might rail against the evils of "Nanny States" but Germany and Scandinavian countries provide more social services to their people than anyone else, and they're are also doing better economically than anyone else. It pays to take care of people. These aren't -- or shouldn't be -- partisan issues. Universal Health Care is definitely not a Republican talking point. But it's not a plank of the Democratic platform either. It's an idea that just makes sense. No political label needs to be applied.
- Advertisement -


So now let's imagine a government. Not a huge federal bureaucracy ... but something more like a town meeting where we'll discuss what we're going to do. Nothing complicated. Just a voice vote of Yes or No. For this example if anyone votes "No," the motion is defeated.

We begin by voting on keeping our water supply unpolluted. A voice in the back shouts out "NO."

Next we vote on not poisoning the land. The same guy shouts out "NO."

How about cleaning up the air? NO!

Eliminating toxins and genetically modified organisms from our food supply? NO!

Universal Health Care? NO!

Public schools, housing, and transportation? NO, NO and NO!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.superbeans.com
Some 45 years ago I became aware of the fact that the government of The United States was trying to kill me. I wasn't paranoid or anything. I mean I knew the government wasn't out to kill me personally. They just wanted to kill as many Vietnamese (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fascist Laff Riot

From Now On ... Our Biggest Mistake is Believing We Are Free

Why We Left The United States:

All the World's a Grave

Morons With Movie Cameras

This Is Worse Than That