OpEdNews Op Eds

Sic Transit Dingell

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/24/08

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)

The contest between Congressmen Dingell and Waxman was seen as competition between Congressional titans, but it wasn't just jockeying for power: the contest had clear implications for policy: whether the US was going to have a realistic energy policy, or remained mired in the past.

Dingell was naturally an enabler of the big three automakers; he came from Dearborn, and he first entered Congress in 1955, when what was good for General Motors was good for the country. His tenure spans the period when bigger was always better, and up-to-date meant longer tailfins. Dingell is more responsible for the weak-kneed CAFE standards than anyone except the CEO's of the three, and the UAW leadership.

Point of disclosure: as a member of the National Writers Union until this month, I was also a member of the UAW, but I wasn't too happy about its energy policy.

Dingell was a reliable liberal war-horse, who fought the good fight for workers' rights, even when those workers were writers. But he was no environmentalist. The auto industry must change; responsible legislation on mileage standards are now imperative and the old warhorse would have stood in the way. The changes are imperative because: the survival of the auto industry demands that it be forced to build cars--and mass transit--that are partial solutions to global warming, not contributors to its worsening. Second, the Three will have to be pushed to produce cars that people need, rather than the muscle cars they have persuaded some Americans to want.

I hope Waxman is as positive towards organized labor as Dingell: positive, but not in bed with. The UAW should not be allowed to control energy legislation, but it should be encouraged to represent all autoworkers, not just the ones in the northern states working for the big three. Why? So that workers are paid well enough that the consumer market has customers who don't have to go into debt to keep the economy going. We know where that leads--to where we are now.

Henry Ford, no lover of unions, first declared that workers needed to be paid enough so they could buy his cars. The credit crash was precipitated by policies that forgot that simple formula, policies going back to Reagan. I hope that when Waxman, Richardson (Secretary of Commerce designee) and President Obama consider how to help the big three, that they remember Ford's dictum; help does not mean cutting autoworkers' wages; it would certainly mean oversight of the ailing companies.


We got what we needed: a critic of the auto industry, not an enabler: Waxman, not Dingell.

 

http://www.roman-empire-america-now.com

I am a writer and retired college teacher. I taught college courses in Economics and Political Science (I've a Ph.D) and I've written as a free-lancer for various publications. I now write a website and a blog at (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Answering Conservative Arguments Against Healthcare Reform

A Camera is a Terror Weapon!

Muscle-bound America

Peak Oil Happened Already

I'm Hit By the Underground Economy

Why Prosecutions of Bush-Cheney Are a Bad Idea

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It wasn't Dingell, however, who sponsored a bi... by Douglas Smyth on Monday, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:32:42 PM
  I'm not convinced our (us) environmenta... by Richard Lee on Tuesday, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:43:02 PM
  According to former Labor Sect'y Reich,... by Richard Lee on Tuesday, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:15:59 PM