Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Help Johnnie Lee Savory Get His DNA Tests So He Can Prove His Innocence.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Touching 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 1/13/12

Johnnie Lee Savory was first arrested for a double murder he did not commit at the age of 14.  (Juvenile laws?)  His sentence was commuted last year by the Governor of Illinois.  He is now 50 and has spent most of his life in jail.  He is asking the Governor of Illinois to allow DNA tests which he says will fully exonerate him, but Governor Quinn is refusing even though it would cost the state nothing, because supporters will cover the costs.  The New York Times reported in 2009 that prosecutors often block potentially exculpatory DNA tests.

Supporters include five former U.S. Attorneys, authors John Grisham and Studs Terkel.  If you watch no other TV show in 2012, watch this Tavis Smiley episode.  It could change your view of life.  I cried.

"Injustice has touched every man and woman from all walks of life.  Injustice is like a stray bullet. It doesn't care where it lands." -- Johnnie Lee Savory, Forensic Magazine

Watch Innocence Project Panel Discussion Part 2 on PBS. See more from Tavis Smiley.

From Savory website

On January 17, 1977, James Robinson, 14, and his 18 year old sister, Connie Cooper, were murdered in their Peoria home. By all accounts, it was a gruesome, senseless waste of life. It is no less to Johnnie Lee Savory. James was a close friend of Johnnie's, a friend with whom he attended school. Grieving for the loss of a close friend at age 14 is painful enough. Imagine the pain in having to fight for you own life in the process. Johnnie Lee Savory was convicted for the murders of his friend and his friend's sister. For 22 years, his life has been a living hell. To fully comprehend Johnnie's misery, you have to look at the facts of the case. He was convicted on one piece of evidence; coerced, inculpatory statements made after hours of grueling interrogation. Statement, which on appeal, the Court deemed never should have been allowed. On January 25, 1977, Johnnie Lee Savory was abducted from his school by the Peoria Police Department, vigorously interrogated, stripped naked so hair sample could be taken from his body, and coerced into confessing to a crime that he had not committed. This confession was the sole piece of evidence the State had to justify their torture of this young boy. There was no physical evidence linking Johnnie to the crime scene.

*According to Police and lab reports, "..fingernail

          scrapings (from the right hand of Connie (victim),

          and hair taken form Connie's right hand, hair from

          Robinson's left hand""  "None Match Savory's"

          "fingerprints found in the home of the victims"


Another startling fact that is unquestionably in Johnnie's favor was the family dog. The presence of the dog in the Robinson's home at the time of the murder alone is proof of Johnnie's innocence. The dog was very protective of James and Connie. He would not let any stranger in the Robinson home. Testimony from the victims mother, stepfather, relatives, and family friends, all affirm the fact that the German Shepherd was ferocious, and affirm that the dog had to be locked away from people whom he did not know.

*Troubleman (the dog) had a record, longer than some

           criminals, for biting strangers and violent behavior.

          *Peter Douglas (victims' stepfather) says the dog was

           loose in the house when he arrived home and found the

           bodies of the victims.

*Peter Douglas told police that the dog would bite a

           stranger, therefore the murderer would have had to

           been known by the dog to enter the house.  Johnnie's

           first visit to the Robinson home was the night before

           the murders took place.  At that time, the dog had to

           be locked in another room for the duration of the

           time Johnnie was in the home.

*Renatta Williams (a family friend) says that the dog

           is vicious.  Police say the dog had to be segregated

           during the investigation of the crime scene.

          *According to one police report, "The dog barked and

           jumped at the door at 10:00 a.m., 1/18/77, when a Del

           Farms salesman delivered a pamphlet to the home.

In 1980 the Illinois Third District Appellate Court ruled that Johnnie's confession was illegally obtained in violation of his state and civil constitutional rights. He was never read his Miranda rights at any time prior to interrogation by Peoria Police and his right to have a parent present during interrogation was denied.

*The State appealed to the Illinois Supreme Court

          to overturn the Appellate Court decision"

          That Appeal Was Denied!

        *The State then appealed to the United States Supreme

          Court"Their Appeal Was Denied!

        *State's Attorney Michael Mihm was quoted as saying,

          "We cannot retry him (Savory) without his statement,

          so that's it, he won't be retried again."

        *State's Attorney John Barra was quoted as saying,

          "Without it (the confession) there is no substantial

          evidence to tie Savory to the crime or the scent of

          the crime.  I don't know how it would be possible to

          try him without it"

Johnnie returned to Peoria County with absolutely NO EVIDENCE against him. Surprisingly, the State was able to coerce three members of the same family (Frank, Tina, and Ella Ivy) to testify under oath that Johnnie had made admissions to each of them on the day of the murders concerning the deaths of James Robinson and Connie Cooper, adding the Ivy family to the then growing list of victims in order to secure an otherwise nonexistent conviction.

*In 1977, statements taken from the Ivy family made

          no mention of Savory's alleged admissions to them

          concerning the deaths of the two teenagers.

        *During the second trial, Frank Ivy agreed to a taped

          interview with Charlie Peters, an investigator from

          the Appellate Defender's Office.  During that interview,

          Frank admitted that Savory had never made

          Any statements concerning the deaths of the victims.

        *In a written recantation, Tina Ivy states that she was facing

          criminal charges herself, that Johnnie made admissions

          of guilt to her on the day of the murders.

Based on the testimony of the Ivy family, Johnnie was once again convicted of these crimes. In 1983 Frank and Tina Ivy contacted Savory's attorney of their own free will, and gave sworn affidavits that they had lied during the second trial in 1981. The Judicial System again denied Johnnie's freedom in their efforts to secure their own political positions and to cover up the truth.

Next Page  1  |  2


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Let Johnny Lee Savory Have His DNA Tests

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on the (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Just wondering...  ... by Jill Herendeen on Saturday, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:57:35 AM