Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Hedging, Delusion and Dishonesty in Afghanistan

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 4/20/11

Become a Fan
  (49 fans)

opednews.com

"The Americans have not been honest about this, even among themselves."

 

That's how Mullah Attullah Lodin, deputy chairman of the High Peace Council of Afghanistan sees our nation and its government as it relates to the question of permanent bases in Afghanistan and to his specific portfolio, the establishment of peace in Afghanistan.

Lodin is a former Hizb-e Islami militia commander (they fought the Russians), and he's now in the Karzai government. Some might suggest he has an agenda, which generally means he's not in synch with US policy. Americans don't have "agendas." The presumption is Afghans are backward and corrupt and somehow not as worthy of trust as a westerner or an American. And he's all for talking peace with the Taliban, which makes him radioactive.

Under the reigning myth of American Exceptionalism, whatever Americans do is right and good because they are Americans and -- more important -- because they have the most lethal weapons on the planet, up to and including the R&D marvel of the Afghanistan War, lethal drone technology.

As the rock anthem says: We are the champions!


Mullah Attullah Lodin, Kabul and the Mad Hatter by (unknown)



Only in America can a man in a flight suit in an air-conditioned room monitor TV screens following unaware people going about their business 10,000 miles away and, on orders from some other air-conditioned room, while sipping a Diet Pepsi turn those distant human beings into exploded pieces of steaming offal and flesh. This man, then, gets in his car and drives home to dinner with his wife and kids.

So far, we have not heard what it's like in the realm of Post Traumatic Stress to do this kind of lethal and remote "combat" day-in-day-out. At what point does a drone "pilot" burn out or crack up? Is there a rest and relaxation spa and special counselors for drone pilots who begin to ask moral questions?

Drones are clearly the future of American warfare. As one NPR commentator put it recently, drone warfare in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan is the largest unreported story in America.

Recently I had a brief discussion on drones with an Iraq veteran turned reporter who said he had been in Special Ops. For him, the reason reporters are prevented access to drone "pilots" was a matter of security, while for me it was a matter of moral embarrassment. The secret technology isn't what's interesting; it's the mental human condition of these men (and presumably women) as they ponder the moral implications of this new field of remote warfare.

But drone pilots are part of the tactical aspects of the war. Like their physically vulnerable brothers and sisters on the ground in Afghanistan, they are just doing their jobs. For our deployed soldiers in Afghanistan, insurgents who see them only as "foreign" troops want them to leave and are trying to kill them. And nothing focuses the mind like someone trying to kill you.

But when Mullah Lodin talks about American dishonesty, he's talking on the level of strategic policy making. And, in this ethereal realm, he could not be more correct. The dishonesty operates at such a profound and widely accepted level it's become a national tragedy. The double-speak employed by US leaders concerning our future presence in Afghanistan is like passing through the looking glass to a land of giant toadstools and mad hatters.

As the great reporter Rod Nordland points out in The New York Times [1], it's now being called "Great Game 3.0," following the Russian and English Great Games of the past. Before that you could include Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan. Like them, we are in Afghanistan because it's central in SW Asia and we insist on projecting our imperial power into the region.

As the US insists on building what appear to pretty much everybody as permanent bases, Stepan Anikeev, a political adviser in the Russian embassy in Kabul, asks the obvious question: "How is transition possible with these bases? ... We have no guarantee they're not permanent."

"One [American] says we are not building bases, another says we are building them, and it's very confusing." That's Mullah Attullah Lodin, again, from the Afghan High Peace Council.

The issue is a document called the Strategic Partnership Declaration for US-Afghan relations after 2014, the date the US declared it will remove its forces from Afghanistan, a date that replaced the original date, which was the end of this year. So, now -- if I have this correct -- US forces are negotiating how long to stay beyond 2014, the date they say they are going to leave.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I am a 65-year-old American who served in Vietnam as a naive 19-year-old kid. From that moment on, I've been studying and re-thinking what US counter-insurgency war means. I live outside of Philadelphia, where I'm a writer, photographer and a video (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Drug War: A Roller-Coaster To Hell

A Conspiracy of Whores

They're "Slow Torturing" Bradley Manning Right Under Our Noses

A Troubled Nation Feeds On bin Laden's Corpse

Bradley Manning and the secret world

Marijuana and PTSD: Give the Joy of Life a Chance

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
1. The New Middle East planned by the American Cen... by syed mahdi on Thursday, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:25:44 AM