OpEdNews Op Eds

Healthcare paradox: Nadya Shulman

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 2/16/09

Nadya Shulman is a one woman mini bail out.  Taxpayers are going to pay for her and her 14 kids while she pursues a masters degree.

A lot of people seem to be blaming the doctor.  I don't see why you'd want to do that.  The doctor had 2 options, say "yes" or "no".  He's screwed either way:

If he says "no", he's a villain denying care.  As people on this website have said, what they want is care delivered as requested by the patient.

Note: "That's what a human right looks like and feels like. Care given when care is needed. Period."

Who decides? The patient.  Most of the healthcare articles seem to mirror this desire; Donna Smith's article very eloquently conveys it.

On the other hand, people seem to say the doctor is at fault, he should have denied her this treatment she sought.  Well, isn't that the fundamental principle of an HMO?  If I were a doctor, I would never deny care.  Let the insurance adjudicator be the bad guy.  I don't need that patient's anger directed at me.  Who am I to be an ethics judge?  Let the elected judges do that.  My job as a doctor is to provide care as care is requested.  The courts are very clear about embryos, they are the property of the patient.  If a patient has 8 embryos and wants 8 implanted, the doctor must do so.  That is the legal precedent.

It's a tough problem.  My solution is to have voluntary taxes.  If you as a CA taxpayer wish to bail her out, pay the tax.  If you do not, do not pay the tax.  Consider the consequences.  If you do not pay the tax, you are more than likely condemning her & her flock of children to a rather inhospitable life, possibly death.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Healthcare paradox: Nadya Shulman

The specifics of how a single payer Healthcare system would look like

Healthcare Legislation & Policy Update

Health Care Facts for Future Article Writers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Shulman picks the most horrendous example possible... by liberalsrock on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:37:33 AM
There's no Mr. Shulman... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:02:03 AM
If you do mean me, where the heck do I say everyth... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:27:15 AM
I can speak as a physician. A physician has a choi... by Hosea McAdoo on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:28:40 AM
I agree with you Mr. McAdoo, in an ideal world.&nb... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:07:24 PM
Children are  people, their value to society ... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:18:40 PM
Where do I praise Miss Suleman? Where do I state a... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:54:01 PM
Did I say that I did not want to pay the voluntary... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:56:44 PM
"There but for the grace of -od go I."&n... by Jane Schiff on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:31:48 PM
Why are people so angry?  And why do they thi... by Matthew T. on Monday, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:53:46 PM