Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 7/28/15

Hawking, Musk, Woz: We Must Ban the "Kalashnikovs of Tomorrow" ie., Robot War Machines

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Message Common Dreams

Original at Common Dreams by Nadia Prupis,

Weapons that can kill without human operators are "the third revolution in warfare," AI experts warn. And it wouldn't take much to start a global arms race.


A Phalanx close-in weapons system (CIWS), which Human Rights Watch calls a prototype for fully autonomous weapons--or
A Phalanx close-in weapons system (CIWS), which Human Rights Watch calls a prototype for fully autonomous weapons--or 'killer robots'--fires at sea.
(Image by (Photo: U.S. Navy/flickr/cc))
  Details   DMCA

More than 1,000 science and technology experts on Monday published an open letter calling for a ban on autonomous weapons -- machines capable of killing without human operators -- to prevent a "virtually inevitable" high-stakes global arms race.

Among the signatories are physicist and professor Stephen Hawking, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, among many others. The letter was presented at the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

"Autonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention," the letter states. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is -- practically if not legally -- feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms."

The letter continues:

"If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable, and the endpoint of this technological trajectory is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow.... It will only be a matter of time until they appear on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, etc. Autonomous weapons are ideal for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations and selectively killing a particular ethnic group."

Proponents of autonomous weapons say the machines would be useful in reducing military casualties on the battlefield. But the letter's authors counter that, in doing so, the weapons would lower the threshold for armed conflict -- risking more frequent battles and a greater loss of civilian life.

They state: "There are many ways in which AI can make battlefields safer for humans, especially civilians, without creating new tools for killing people."

The letter is the most recent call for a preemptive ban on the weapons, often referred to colloquially as killer robots.

In April, a joint report by Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School's International Human Rights Clinic found that autonomous weapons present "serious moral and legal concerns" and could not only violate international law, but make it virtually impossible to pursue accountability for victims.

The report, titled Mind the Gap: The Lack of Accountability for Killer Robots and presented to the United Nations meeting on lethal weapons, called on the international body to ban such tools before they can be created.

While fully autonomous weapons do not yet exist, HRW noted, their prototypes -- such as the U.S. army's Phalanx CIWS and Israel's Iron Dome -- are already in use.

Rate It | View Ratings

Common Dreams Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

commondreams.org is a progressive publisher
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Drone Papers: Leaked Military Documents Expose US "Assassination Complex"

WH Stenographer Who Resigned in Protest: Trump's "Not Even Trying to Tell the Truth"

'Smoking Gun': White House Finally Admits Bannon and Kobach Were Racist Minds Behind Scheme to Rig 2020 Census

Food Lobby Colossus Sues Vermont over GMO 'Right to Know'

Here Are the 19 Senate Democrats Still Not Committed to Defending Net Neutrality

Bernie Sanders May Run for President in 2016

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend