Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 6 Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (15 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Have Two Dying Banks Managed To Trick Us Into Paying For Their Next Bailout?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 10/25/11

Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
- Advertisement -

The Bank of America's holding company, BAC, has directed the transfer of a large number of "troubled' financial derivatives from its Merrill Lynch subsidiary to the federally insured Bank of America.   Even worse, the Federal Reserve has supported this transfer even though the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) opposed it.

Story  here.

Yves Smith of NakedCapitalism has written an appropriately blistering attack on this outrageous action, which puts the public at substantially increased risk of loss.

Story  here. 

As it turns out, massive fraud was inherent in almost all aspects of B of A's acquisition of Countywide Home Loans.   This article explores the defrauding of shareholders, the fraud inherent in B of A's acquisition of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), and the many conflicts of interest that prevailed.

BAC's request to transfer these problem-derivatives (CDOs) to the FDIC-insured B of A was a no brainer -- unfortunately the request was addressed to officials at the Fed who meet that description:   no brainers.   Either that or they are totally corrupt.   Any competent regulator with integrity would have said,"No, Hell NO!"   Indeed, any competent regulator with integrity would have had two related and acute concerns immediately upon receiving the request.   First, the holding company's controlling managers pose a severe problem because they are seeking to improperly exploit their FDIC-insured institution, B of A.   Second, the senior managers of B of A acceded to the transfer, apparently without protest, even though the transfer poses a severe threat to B of A's survival.   So what exactly do these clowns have in mind?   Their failure to act to prevent the transfer contravenes both their fiduciary duties of loyalty and care, and should lead to their immediate resignations.   But that's not the worst of it!

Here's the really bad news.   First, this transfer is a superb "natural experiment" that tests one of the most important questions central to the health of our financial system:   Is the central purpose of the Fed to represent and vigorously protect the interests of the people of the U.S., or is it to protect the systemically dangerous institutions (SDIs) -- the largest 20 banks?   Very few Americans will be surprised to learn that the Fed represents the interests of the SDIs even though they are, in this case, directly contrary to the interests of the nation.

Second, it is extremely likely that neither B of A's CEO nor the Fed even thought about whether the transfer was consistent with the CEO's fiduciary duties to the B of A.

- Advertisement -

Third, reread the Bloomberg column and try to wrap your mind around the size of Merrill Lynch's derivatives positions.  

Fourth, consider that Merrill is only one shrinking player in the derivatives game.

Fifth, reread Yves' column in Naked Capitalism where she explains that many derivatives cannot be used safely.   Add to that the point about how they can be used to create a "sure thing" of record fictional profits, record compensation -- and catastrophic losses.  

 Story  here.

 

- Advertisement -

Finally, if you're struggling to grasp or digest all this, and want to better understand the previous few paragraphs, watch this short Thom Hartmann video clip.   Thom explains it all in simple terms.

 

 

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

 Go immediately to the nearest large book sto... by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:20:44 PM
Thanks for putting this matter in simple term... by AAA AAA on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:59:55 PM
NOT ANTI WALL-STREET AT ALL, BUT INSTEAD RACIALLY ... by Gepaart Visioner on Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:31:08 PM
This alarming story from Bloomberg hit the wires j... by Richard Clark on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:15:36 PM
Former manager at Goldman Sachs reports:"The total... by Richard Clark on Thursday, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:53:28 PM
The fact remains that the FDIC does not insure der... by AAA AAA on Friday, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:50:12 AM