Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 17 (17 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Has MSNBC muzzled Maddow, Olbermann?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/3/09

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

Speculation has been growing concerning MSNBC's editorial muzzle since Olbermann and Maddow were reportedly prohibited from commenting on the Jon Stewart/Jim Cramer controversy, presumably not to embarrass the xNBC family.

But I've been much more perplexed at Maddow in particular in failing to report the Mike Connell story. Following Rachel since her Air America radio debut with Chuck D, this seems exactly the type of juicy GOP mystery Rachel boldly made her name with - when no one else would.

After succeeding in her mainstream media debut, Rachel signed a six figure deal with MSNBC. But what kind of non-disclosure agreements were included in this, or Olbermann's seven figure deal. Were there any editorial constraints written in? I would imagine this is standard practice in an industry that has for years routinely ignored "depressing" war news, disregarded shocking corruption scandals and grossly blew off election integrity issues.

When Mike Connell died alone in a plane crash last December, the blogosphere immediately began speculating whether he was bumped off because he was forced to testify about his role in the  Ohio 2004  election where Bush astonishingly upended John Kerry's lead in the dark of the night.

But even more troubling than his murder conspiracy theory, was the revelation that Connell oversaw the official Ohio Secretary of State vote reporting website at the same time he was running the sites for the Bush campaign, the SwiftBoat campaign and dozens of other highly partisan GOP/RNC websites.

Much to America's chagrin, Maddow and Olbermann neglected any mention of this appalling conflict, or even Connell's demise, after it appeared on AP's newswire, the CBS News website and Huffington Post, also blanketing Ohio TV and print media for weeks. As a devoted fan of Rachel's many "soft white underbelly" reports, t his made me question Maddow's free hand.

But what was it about the story that made it so toxic?  Few progressives would deny that the mainstream media has squelched some of the most crucial issues of our time. When Congress filed articles of impeachment against Bush, it didn't even make the 6 o'clock news. A relative of mine who used to work for CNN confirmed there was absolutely an executive hand censoring the news throughout the Bush years, with a trash can right next to the ticker - as if we couldn't see this for ourselves on the air. 

We know MSNBC has been seeking to expand it's "liberal" line-up after an 8-year lockout of critical reporting on Bush and Cheney's exploits. But is MSNBC hiring progressives because the country is shifting its attitude, or because their bosses want to contain the liberal message by getting these influential voices under contractual control?

In the end, it's a probably a more complex web of money, market share and message. Ad revenue, demographics and political pull are all ingredients in the secret meetings held by the big TV execs. 

But any potential evidence that vote flipping took place should be thoroughly examined, if only to be debunked. The national media whitewash of Connell's IT work bodes poorly on the chances of the two 2004 Ohio vote fraud cases alleging Kenneth Blackwell, Karl Rove and other officials knew of network vulnerabilities during Bush's miracle 2 AM comeback.

Lou Dobbs' bosses at CNN also got cold feet after taping a segment with Cliff Arnebeck, the lead attorney in the case - it never aired. So there must be a great story-behind-the-story being held secret concerning Maddow's non-reporting of the Connell story as well. 

Network news is sadly still news with an asterisk, and as Cyndi Lauper says, money changes everything. Rachel Maddow is still the first thing I watch on TV, with stellar guests, insightful questions, an incisive wit and an uplifting through-it-all positivity. But MSNBC's new progressive phalanx badly needs to upgrade their transparency.

*Updated: See Follow Up: MSNBC Muzzling Maddow, Olbermann on Election Integrity?

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Rachel and Keith mark my only excursions into Amer... by Jason Paz on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:40:00 AM
Great job getting that question on the air!!! ;)&n... by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:23:38 AM
Media sells product. The end! If/when a network do... by SCUBAJohn on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:45:12 AM
John, that was true when we were younger. What is ... by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:14:19 PM
... by now that the best thing you could do with y... by Mr M on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:55:59 AM
A free press is the voice a democracy.  When ... by Sister Begonia on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:20:39 AM
Ed Schultz appears to have sold out before he even... by Joel Myron on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:24:36 AM
No mainstream or cable media outlet will touch the... by Tim Fleming on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:33:29 AM
For the record, I've always maintained murder alle... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:02:34 PM
Why you watch any of the MSM is beyond me. I gave ... by Archie on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:18:02 AM
Thanks, GustavName names, raise Hell.  Americ... by Rafe Pilgrim on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:22:40 AM
About the Maddow, Olbermann thing. I only hope Kei... by Jerry Chandler on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:14:49 PM
Question Everything. Even if you think you can tru... by Paula Sayles on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:06:46 PM
I wish you were one of the Senators from Kansas.... by Blaine Kinsey on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:15:11 PM
Ever since the ABC news report in the eighties, WH... by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:24:38 PM
But we all have to admit that MSNBC's signing of O... by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:44:59 AM
Election theft is the most explosive story of all.... by Perry Logan on Saturday, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:40:07 AM
Here is a nice thread on my blog with stories incl... by nation of gandhis on Saturday, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:53:43 PM