Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 8 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (24 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Hacking the recalls: Why we must have hand-counted paper ballots and citizen exit polls.

      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Valuable 4   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 7/9/11

Author 5119
Become a Fan
  (25 fans)
- Advertisement -
by Grant W. Petty and Sheila Parks

original post: click here

It goes without saying that the outcomes of the nine Senate recall elections scheduled in Wisconsin will be of intense interest to most of the UW-Madison community.  Forecasting the outcome of elections weeks in advance is always a risky business; nevertheless, we offer the following bold prediction:

In at least some cases, the candidate receiving the lesser of the actual votes cast -- perhaps, in fact, the candidate you passionately opposed -- will be declared the official victor.

Chances are, you either think we are nuts or you are already upset with the dismal state of elections in Wisconsin, if not the country.  Either way, we hope this article will change your view of  both (a) the security of the elections and (b) the ability of ordinary citizens like you to improve that security.

Here's a second prediction which gets to the heart of the real problem:

No one -- not the Government Accountability Board, not the media, not any elected official, and most certainly not you -- has the slightest hope of ever  disproving our first prediction in light of current election procedures and practices.

While our first prediction is open to debate, the second is rock solid. Why? Because our appallingly compromised election procedures in this state are simply incapable of detecting or preventing election fraud, due to a combination of wholly inadequate statutory safeguards and criminally negligent enforcement.

- Advertisement -

(Note by the way, that we are not talking about voter fraud, which was ostensibly the reason behind the recently enacted voter ID law.  Both the prevalence and practical significance of voter fraud is a discredited myth.  If you want your candidate to win an election dishonestly, it is far easier and more effective to rig the counting of the ballots on the electronic voting machines. We find it interesting and significant that those in the Wisconsin Legislature who rammed through the voter ID law have so little to say about the far greater threat of election fraud. )

Election fraud is not just a hypothetical concern.  In addition to strong circumstantial evidence in countless other cases, instances of clear fraud have been uncovered that led to actual indictments in CuyahogaCountyOhio, and Clay CountyKentucky.   Echoes of Cuyahoga can be heard (by those inclined to hear them) in the recent Waukesha recount.

Experts on election integrity have been sounding two main alarms for at least ten years:  (1) it's far too easy to rig elections in ways that are difficult to detect, and (2) there is considerable circumstantial evidence that it is regularly occurring.

Consider this:  Approximately 1.48 million votes were cast in the Prosser v. Kloppenburg election. The final published difference between them was a mere 7,004 votes, so flipping only 3,502 of them could have given the election back to Kloppenburg.  That's only a single vote flipped (or, alternatively, two Prosser votes simply discarded) per 422 cast!

Now consider this:  Electronic voting machines use proprietary software to tabulate votes.  Not even election officials are allowed to view or test the integrity of the software or the memory cards. The counting of votes simply cannot be observed or verified by the voting public or the election officials.  It is impossible to know whether it is being done correctly and honestly. We are being told to take it on faith that the voting machine vendors, and those who have access to the machines, are honest.  This is not merely risky, it is fundamentally antithetical to democracy.

- Advertisement -

The Emmy-nominated documentary Hacking Democracy (free viewing online, 81 min.) presents a shocking demonstration of how easily electronic votes can be hacked, and it also offers troubling evidence that election rigging is actually occurring.  Even if you don't read beyond this point, please view Hacking Democracy and urge family, friends, and acquaintances to watch it as well.  You will never view our elections or electronic voting machines the same way again.

We're accustomed to hearing the phrase "innocent until proven guilty" applied to suspects being tried for crimes, and that's as it should be.  But we in the United States, more so than in many other developed countries, inappropriately apply the same standard of evidence to our elections. Our naive assumption is that unless unambiguous evidence of fraud or gross error is actually uncovered, it most likely didn't occur.  If you can't see it, it must not exist.  This is what those who corrupt the election process count on.

Election fraud, like any crime, requires both motive and opportunity. And ample motive can already be found on either side of the current ideological divide in our country.

Imagine the zealous conservative who sincerely believes that abortion is murder and that liberal politicians are therefore condoning murder on a large scale.  Or imagine the zealous liberal who sincerely believes that conservative policies will condemn the earth to perish, and soon, from runaway greenhouse warming.  Either of these individuals might be persuaded that it's morally justified and urgently necessary to commit election fraud in defense of humankind.

Would anyone who cares about honest elections deliberately put either person in charge of actually overseeing and enforcing election procedures? But that's exactly what we do with our partisan elections for county clerks!

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Sheila Parks, Ed.D.,is now working to CLOSE PILGRIM NOW and to CLOSE all nuclear power plants, all of which are crimes against humanity,all living creatures, and our beautiful and so troubled planet Earth. She spent many years in the struggle (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fukushima, Miso Soup and Me

The Pacific Ocean Does Not Belong to Japan: It Belongs to All of Us

Election Rigging Plotted on ABC's Scandal: The Real Life Backstory

Pilgrim's Nuclear Power Keeps on Giving: Cancer


SCANDAL ABC: Defiance, Ohio and Boston, Massachusetts


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Dutch rejected electronic voting on the fascis... by Mike Preston on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:08:09 AM
Hi MikeYes, the Dutch, Germany, Ireland all got ri... by Sheila Parks on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:56:14 AM
I would like to refer any and everyone to somethin... by Turbo Kitty on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:52:16 AM
This is a comprehensive broadside at the general s... by Michael Collins on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:25:44 PM
There is an unsung hero in  Richard Charnin a... by Mike Preston on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:47:25 PM
Dear Michael, Thx so much for your kind ... by Sheila Parks on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:14:07 PM
Elections are manipulated at many different levels... by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:33:38 PM
but,but...How,would the republicans get somebody e... by GUY P. FRASER on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:28:50 AM
This is news?  Since Kerry's 2004 election an... by Joanne Boyer on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:22:28 AM
One of the most common objections to paper ballots... by Bia Winter on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:57:04 AM
votes on computers is unconstitutional according t... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:31:32 AM
Sheila:Sometime ago I started doing research regar... by Fay Paxton on Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:13:02 PM