Granting Immunity to Telecoms is a Criminal Act

Congress lacks Authorization to Grant Telecoms Selective Immunity  

Article 4, Section. 2. Clause 1: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. All citizens are entitled to the same immunities.  Telecoms are not entitled to privileged immunities.

War on Terror is a Fraud

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 states:   The Congress shall have Power to provide for calling forth the Militia to suppress an insurrection or to repel an invasion.  Article 1, Section 9 states:No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;

Terror is not a crime.  It has no name, no face, and cannot be caught and jailed.   It's illegal to fund the war on Terror because terror is an emotion and not a tangible thing.  Given terror is invisible, it cannot be fought.   A war against something invisible is absurd.   

The Telecoms violated U.S. citizens' Fourth Amendment rights.  Under the law, they must be prosecuted under the law.  Failure to prosecute criminals is condusive of anarchy.  U.S. citizens are not paying taxes to support anarchy. A Republican Form of GovernmentArticle 4, Section. 4 states:  The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;  The Telecoms engaged in wire tapping while U.S. citizens talked on the phone.  President Nixon was impeached for this.  

President Bush and Congress have no authority under the law to amend the Constitution without State ratification.   Wiretapping, without approval through three-fourths state ratification is therefore illegal.  Ex Post Facto laws are illegalArticle 1, Section 9, Clause 3 states: No ex post facto Law shall be passed.What this means is, what is illegal cannot be made legal retroactively. Voting to grant immunity to the Telecoms for spying on Americans is therefore an illegal act.