Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Government Keeps Us Rich

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/30/12

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

For decades neoclassical economists have asserted the inevitable logic of international convergence. Excess investment flows from rich countries to poor countries while excess labor flows from poor countries to rich countries. The result is a convergence in income among all countries. Given good institutions and free markets, poor countries will rise to become rich.

The logic of neoclassical convergence is impeccable, except for one fatal flaw. If incomes are expected to converge in a free market, why should it be that the poor countries converge to the rich countries' level? Might not rich countries converge downward as well? Shouldn't incomes for all countries converge to meet somewhere in the middle?

The standard against which convergence is usually measured is convergence to US income levels. Many academic papers on convergence even express other countries' incomes in terms of a percentage of US levels. The assumption that all countries will converge with the United States doesn't reflect any deep scientific principle. It merely reflects the fact that most neoclassical economists live and work in the United States.

For most Americans, America is the measure of all things. Like other Americans, American economists tend to see the United States as "normal" and all other countries as somehow aberrant. Take away government regulation, trade unions, minimum wage laws, currency controls, and other impediments to the free market and your country too can be like the United States -- or so the reasoning goes.

The reasoning here is backwards. It assumes that without artificial economic distortions, other countries would be like the United States. Demoting the United States from its privileged perch as the "normal" country yields a more balanced point of view. In the absence of artificial economic distortions, the United States would be like other countries. It's the United States -- technological leader, cultural hegemon, global superpower -- that is exceptional, not the rest of the world.

From this point of view, it's not the rest of the world that has lagged for the past 150 years. It's the United States that has out-performed. To keep its dominant position in the world-economy it must continue to out-perform, year after year, decade after decade. Today's US GDP per capita of over $47,000 reflects over a century of good policies and good luck. There is no guarantee that the US will continue to play its hand so well. Quite the contrary: there are strong indications that it will not.

Do we need more free markets and more privatization? Economists say yes. History says no. We didn't get rich through free markets and privatization. We got rich through government subsidies for transportation (first railroads, then highways, then airports). We got rich through government provision of education (first elementary schools, then high schools, then colleges and universities). We got rich through government support for good health (first immunization, then tax deductions for insurance, then Medicare and Meidcaid).

In short, we became a rich country through massive government intervention to force the economy into providing public goods. Continued government intervention will keep us rich. Get rid of government, and our advantages disappear. Regression to the mean is the most powerful force in statistics. It is just as strong in economics. If economists can't see that, it's because they won't take off their neoclassical goggles.

 

http://salvatorebabones.com

Salvatore Babones is a senior lecturer in sociology and social policy at the University of Sydney in Australia and an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) in Washington, DC.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

There Is no American Left

Economic Statistics Myths-- That Growth Benefits All

The Great Cyprus Bank Robbery

Government Keeps Us Rich

The Problem Isn't Growth; the Problem Is Inequality

The Debt Ceiling Gives the President Enormous Power -- He Should Use It

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Economic theorists surmise that if we got rid of a... by Salvatore Babones on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:11:21 AM
...  let me ask: How about those countries (o... by Ad Du on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:00:12 AM
We need careful government programs and measures t... by BFalcon on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:39:00 PM
Or did you just OD on the "Blue koolaid"? Your go... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:15:32 AM
I can't  believe you still make a distinction... by Wil Masisak on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:38:16 PM
http://4preventiondghtnews.wordpress.com/fiscal-cl... by R. A. Sands, Ret. PI on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:02:15 PM
Under governmental programs and regulations the Un... by Patricia Gray on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:06:08 PM
by being foolish and greedy. Mr. Babone's argumen... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:04:23 AM
The article consists of three, successive errors:(... by Phil Weingart on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:37:25 AM
Not the article much as the reaction.  We all... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:45:41 AM
I read only the conclusion that 'the United States... by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:56:55 AM
those horrible things   will happen no m... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:09:19 AM
The reality is that the countries that prosper do ... by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:22:32 PM