OpEdNews Op Eds

Google v. China: 0 - 1

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -
This is the second of a series about China and human rights. The Old Codger lives in China simply as an ex-pat. As an educator he has access to Chinese people and is able to view the sociological aspects of Chinese culture and tradition. While he tries to pass himself off as just a Lao Wai (old foreigner) many Chinese consider him to be "almost" Chinese.

Google's first complaint was that some e-mail accounts purportedly owned or used by internal and external dissidents were hacked into. That is a valid complaint and should be properly investigated.

The US has an array of laws that allow, and disallow, the government to snoop on both Americans and foreigners -- all in the name of "national security." We know that America does it, regardless of what the laws are -- typically after the fact, and only after great pressure is brought on the government to confess its misdeeds. What we do not know are all the details about the "hidden espionage" and "hidden national security" fronts that the US utilizes to gain information about its own, and other people.It happens.Everyone knows it happens. The problem is that nothing can be proven conclusively.

In the immortal words of Col. Sherman Potter, M*A*S*H -- "bull hockey."

More and more people are now voicing their opinions and beliefs that democracy and all the freedoms the dissidents advocate for, would not be in the best interests of either the country or the Chinese people. These opinions are coming, not only from those within the country, but also from Chinese Americans who have come to live and work in China. In short, and this is not to be disrespectful of the Chinese people, they cannot handle the freedoms or the democracy concepts. These things are totally contrary to Chinese culture and tradition.

With respect to the Chinese bloggers and citizens support of Google, this should not be interpreted to mean anything specific.Humans, like cats, are curious. If they are told they cannot or should not see something, they will want to see it. This is human nature.What must be remembered is that curiosity killed the cat.

- Advertisement -

There is a plethora of information on the Internet that is not really fit for consumption by the masses. Society does not "need" pornography. The world does not need a soapbox for radicals and those focused on destruction of others as is found on the Internet. The world does not need freely available information on how to create weapons of mass destruction. The Internet is full of this type of information, and much other societal damaging information. These types of information only encourage the less stable -- both mentally and emotionally -- to do things that can harm society and the world.

Washington, with its numerous think tanks and experts, no doubt is well aware of the fact that the concepts of democracy and freedoms are contrary to Chinese culture and tradition. The culture and traditions have created sub-societies that are totally dependent on each other, and not individualism. Washington knows that introducing individualism to China would bring the country to its knees. This is what Washington has been attempting to do in subtle ways for time immortal -- bring China to its knees.

In an attempt to discredit China, it is more than feasible that Washington put Google up to this latest charade as it attempts to reassert its position in Asia. China, no longer the "Paper Tiger" it has been perceived to be by Washington, simply told Google that if it wishes to conduct business in the country it must obey all laws. Plain, simple and to the point. It sends Google, and Washington, the clear and concise message that China does not need Google.

In this game, in diplomat speak, Beijing holds the home-court advantage. The rules favor both Beijing and the Chinese people. There is not much that Google or Washington can do to salvage their position in this game.

- Advertisement -

 

Doc is semi-retired, currently living, working and investing in China. Background in medicine (trauma), business and education. Neither a progressive or a conservative; more of a centrist/libertarian who is a strong proponent of personal (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel: Determined to Destroy the World

Apologists for Deadbeat Dads

The Declining of America

Human Rights are Subjective

A Walk Down Memory Lane: Some things haven't changed at all

You Don't Have a Right to Health Care

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Washington has invested far too much effort in lic... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:28:10 PM
that you have no idea what the Chinese people want... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Saturday, Jan 16, 2010 at 7:49:34 AM
that the Chinese people would favorably entertain ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:08:50 AM
services are superior to all things available in t... by Stanimal on Friday, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:44:16 PM