Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   News 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 1/7/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

Good news! House overturns BushCo's most Nixonian order

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Here is some great news: Congress has overwhelmingly revoked BushCo's
notorious Executive Order that permitted former presidents to keep their
papers from the public indefinitely.

Below is Reuters' article, followed by some suitably exultant emails from
some activists in the National Coalition for History.

MCM

House overturns Bush order on papers secrecy
Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:48pm EDT
By Peter Szekely

http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSN1429892120070314?pageNumber=1

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Brushing aside a veto threat, the House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to overturn a 2001 order by President George W. Bush that lets former presidents keep their papers secret indefinitely.

The measure, which drew bipartisan support and passed by a veto-busting 333-93 margin, was among White House-opposed bills the House passed that would widen access to government information and protect government whistleblowers.

"Today, Congress took an important step toward restoring openness and transparency in government," House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman said.

The presidential papers bill nullifies a November 2001 order, criticized by historians, in which Bush allowed the White House or a former president to block release of a former president's papers and put the onus on researchers to show a "specific need" for many types of records.

Among beneficiaries of the Bush order was Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, a former vice president and president.

The order gave former vice presidents the right to stop the release of their papers through an executive privilege that previously only presidents could use. And it extended to deceased presidents' designees rights to keep their papers secret indefinitely.

The House bill would give current and former presidents 40 business days to object to requests to view their papers, allow a sitting president to override a former president's claim of executive privilege and strip former vice presidents and the designees of deceased presidents of the power to use executive privilege to block access to their historical documents.

In its veto warning, the White House said the bill encroaches on the president's constitutional authority and the 40-day deadline would force presidents to use executive privilege to block information requests "out of an abundance of caution" and thereby invite litigation.

The real reason, the White House said, for delays of up to five years in releasing presidential papers to researchers is a lack of archivists at presidential libraries.

Many historians, however, support the House bill, saying the Bush order has slowed the declassification process.

Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archives at George Washington University, said the average time to release presidential documents has grown to 78 months from 18 months since the Bush order, which he said directly contributed to one year of the lag.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Mark's new book, Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008, a (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

YeeeeeeeHaawwwwwwwww! by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:30:19 AM
Ignoring what the Democrats are doing by Perry Logan on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:01:29 AM
Demo-lition by William Whitten on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:23:16 PM
These are lovely buds, by Jack Harrington on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:35:21 PM
Whistleblowers & Investigative Reporters Rejoice by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:41:15 PM
Best News I've Heard Today by PrMaine on Thursday, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:46:44 PM
Neither troll nor nattering nabob by Jack Harrington on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:37:33 PM