Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 7 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (15 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The DOJ's and SEC's "Get Out Of Jail" Cards For Wall Street

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 11/2/11

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Did you ever wonder why nobody is getting prosecuted for the biggest white-collar crime in the history of the world--the worldwide financial collapse of 2007-2008? The answers have started to come out.

One explanation involves a remarkably lenient  U.S. Department of Justice, who were apparently sensitive to large corporations, like Wall Street banks, having to worry about being hauled off to jail. Can you imagine how upset bank execs would be if they knew the DOJ would come after them for some clever little transgressions that may have inadvertently blown up the world's economy?

Two New York Times reporters several months back discovered that federal prosecutors adopted lenient new guidelines in 2008 allowing "deferred prosecutions," enabling the Department of Justice to essentially handslap corporate criminals. Rather than a guilty or not guilty plea, the government allowed companies to investigate themselves and report whatever wrongdoings they found. The feds could then delay or dismiss any prosecution if the companies promised to change its behavior. You know, a kinder, gentler DOJ.


Do bankers always win? by
greanvillepost.com

According to Gretchen Mortenson and Louise Story ("As Wall St. Polices Itself, Prosecutors Use Softer Approach," New York Times, July 7, 2011) this lenient policy may help explain why nobody is being held accountable for the super-sized white-collar crimes in the housing and financial markets:

Though little noticed outside legal circles, the guidelines were welcomed by firms representing banks...The guidelines left open a possibility other than guilty or not guilty, giving leniency often if companies investigated and reported their own wrongdoing. In return, the government could enter into agreements to delay or cancel the prosecution if the companies promised to change their behavior.

Although these "deferred prosecutions" were used in the Bush Administration prior to the financial crisis, the DOJ made them official in 2008. They must have figured the banks had plenty enough to worry about and didn't need the pressure of any pesky prosecutors lurking about.

The Securities and Exchange Commission also added deferred prosecution as a tool last year and has embraced another alternative to litigation -- reports that chronicle wrongdoing at institutions like Moody's Investors Service, often without punishing anyone.

That's right. Their punishment is having a report published about their criminal activity.

Another example of this more cautious prosecutorial strategy: Government lawyers now go to companies earlier in an inquiry, and often tell companies to figure out whether improper activities occurred. Then those companies hire law firms to investigate and report back to the government.

Some critics call it "outsourcing" of investigations, according to Morgenson and Story, who go on to detail numerous examples of collusion between corporations and the government.

Such results provide bragging rights among corporate defense lawyers, according to longtime observers of the legal system.

"The corporate crime defense bar has this down to a science," said Russell Mokhiber, the editor of Corporate Crime Reporter, a publication that tracks prosecutions. "I interview them all the time, and they boast about how they've gamed the system."

This is the kind of story the American people should have been enraged about. And they probably would have been, if they had known about it. The New York Times investigation was published last July, and wasn't a sexy or interesting enough story to get much play at that time in the corporate news media. Besides, it wouldn't be in the media company's best interest to call attention to it.

Because of the Occupy Wall Street movement, we are seeing more scrutiny given to the crimes of the banksters. This story is one more outrage to add to the list of government and Wall Street collusion.

While the Big Boys of Wall Street have yet to be held accountable for tanking the economy, it would be nice to think the current sharper focus on the financial industry could put pressure on the Obama Justice Department, enough to force them to actually do their job of prosecuting crimes.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

thebigpicturereport.com

Arlen is a writer/blogger living in Monterey, CA. His political blog is thebigpicturereport.com. He writes a weekly quotation quiz "What's Your QQ?" (Quotation Quotient) for the Monterey County Herald, as well as a quotationquotient.com website and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"No War By Any Nation in Any Age Has Ever Been Declared By the People"

Is the CIA Everywhere? Maybe Your Paranoia is Justified

Which America Do You Live In: Newsweek's "SuperCountry" or Reich's Stalled "Tinder-Box"?

The Fed's Unprecedented Generosity

How Occupy Wall Street Helped Obama Win

The DOJ's and SEC's "Get Out Of Jail" Cards For Wall Street

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What are the chances a growing OWS movement could ... by Arlen Grossman on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:50:43 AM
Holder is a part of the problem. Obama should appo... by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:52:23 AM
My dear mr. Kall,Now, a definition of fascism I li... by Robert James on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:35:49 AM
May like any definition you want but the truth is ... by BFalcon on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:52:09 AM
  Because it is written by Stephen Lendman,do... by GUY P. FRASER on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:25:15 AM
The bankers had very little to do with the financi... by Phil Weingart on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:32:42 PM
How can you say "The bankers had very little to do... by Arlen Grossman on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:33:43 PM
Seems these two were just scanning when researchin... by GUY P. FRASER on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:39:00 AM
Thank you for the simple explanation of what cause... by sbaker on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:07:13 PM
So the rating agencies "failed to understand", the... by Robert James on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:10:21 PM
And bank robbers are just people who don't underst... by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:34:50 AM
It was people who were in the market to purcha... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:51:51 PM
This cannot be blamed "on bush".It is the current ... by steve windisch on Thursday, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:05:18 AM