Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

General News

Georgia Shockingly Plans To Execute Man With Intellectual Disability: U.S. Supreme Court Last Hope to Stop It

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/11/13

Author 88842
- Advertisement -

In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the execution of people with "mental retardation' in Atkins v. Virginia. Now, ten years later, will the State of Georgia listen? Shockingly, Georgia plans to execute Warren Hill, a man with a unanimously confirmed intellectually disability, on Monday, July 15.

Mr. Hill's intellectual disability case has outraged citizens in the U.S. and around the world. The State experts who had previously denied Mr. Hill's "mental retardation' diagnosis (the legal term still used) have come forward with a changed mind. Based on advances in the field, the three doctors reviewed Mr. Hill's case and revised their original diagnoses this year. Now, every doctor who has examined him agrees: Mr. Hill has mental retardation.

Yet Georgia plans to move forward with Mr. Hill's execution on Monday. The reason provided? Technicalities.

In April, a Georgia court ruled that it could not consider the new doctor findings because of procedural barriers. In fact, no court has ever had the chance to consider this critical new information on its merits. What's more -- the Georgia courts themselves have repeatedly affirmed the existence of Mr. Hill's disability. In 2002, and again in 2012, a Georgia state court judge stated that Mr. Hill is a person with mental retardation -- but said that Mr. Hill did not meet Georgia's unique standard for legally proving it -- the strictest in the nation. Indeed, Georgia is the only state in the country that requires a defendant to prove mental retardation "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Now, as a result of procedural technicalities and the State's impossibly strict burden of proof, Georgia risks executing a man who is intellectually disabled.

That is why Mr. Hill's case has received extensive and diverse outpouring of support from mental health experts, intellectual disability organizations, legal experts, several of the jurors from trial, and even President Jimmy Carter and Rosalyn Carter. The family of the victim also strongly supports clemency for Mr. Hill.

- Advertisement -

The Atlantic columnist Andrew Cohen described Mr. Hill's case as an illustration of "the width of the gulf that exists in America today between the rule of law that people think they have and the rule of law they actually do have" ( ). Many people still have faith in the rule of law in our country -- let's give them reason to by staying Mr. Hill's execution.

Executing Warren Hill would violate the U.S. Constitution. Plain and simple. The U.S. Supreme Court is now the only court that can do what is right and ensure that we do not put to death a mentally retarded man. The clock is ticking and only pressing pause can ensure justice.

*Please note that "intellectual disability' is now the proper term for "mental retardation.' In the legal community, "mental retardation' is still the term used by the courts. This term is only employed to avoid confusion among readers.

- Advertisement -


B.A. in Law and Society, American University (2014)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Case of John Ferguson: Why Executing a Man Who Believes He is the "Prince of God" is Against Our Constitution

Georgia Shockingly Plans To Execute Man With Intellectual Disability: U.S. Supreme Court Last Hope to Stop It


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
And so because he is intellectually disabled this ... by Bill Johnson on Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:18:10 PM
I honestly don't see the difference between execut... by Adam Smith on Thursday, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:11:24 PM
Southern injustice. I can't imagine a less intelli... by Archie on Sunday, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:00:10 PM