Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

General McCrystal challenges the President's authority; who will prevail?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 11/4/09

Become a Fan
  (81 fans)
- Advertisement -

Americans await the decision President Obama will make relative to General McCrystal's proposal to send more troops to Afghanistan. Obama and McCrystal, the U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, are locked in a test of power that will have monumental effects on America for decades to come. There are definite indications that Obama does not favor sending more troops, but the general may have cleverly maneuvered Mr. Obama into a no-win situation.

General McCrystal recently sent a formal proposal to President Obama in which he requested at least 40,000 additional troops for the Afghan conflict. The call for more troops is not the least bit surprising but the way he went about doing it is; he decided to take his request to the public before sending it to his Commander-in-Chief. Someone in his organization leaked the document to the Washington Post. Thereafter, he appeared on 60 minutes and then gave a speech in London about his Afghan counterinsurgency strategy. There is no question whatsoever that he is challenging this president's authority.

The behavior and actions taken by our top commander in Afghanistan are very reminiscent of a similar scenario when, in April 1951, President Harry S. Truman removed General Douglas MacArthur from his command of the United Nations forces in Korea when that famous World War II general tried to use the national press to pressure Truman to agree to bomb Communist Chinese bases north of the Yalu River. Truman wasted no time and fired MacArthur, that famous and respected war hero.

McCrystal, hardly of the public stature of McArthur, should read the accounts of this historical incident and decide if he wants to take a risky chance that might make him the modern-day MacArthur. He apparently has crossed the line between who makes the U.S. military policy and who is charged with carrying it out. President Truman, when faced with gross insubordination on MacArthur's part, wasted no time in sending him into retirement. So now we wait while Mr. Obama, who does not like conflict or confrontation, decides what to do about Afghanistan -- and, specifically, about his general.

Here's a quote made recently by Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former top adviser to Secretary of State Colin Powell "We had this happen one time before, with Douglas MacArthur" -- the right-wing general who was fired after he defied President Truman over the Korean War in 1951".

This is an extremely serious situation just as it was back in 1951. America stands at a critical crossroads and we had better make the right turn because of the great impact it will have on the future of our nation. While Mr. Obama is taking a long, deliberate look at the pros and cons involved, as he certainly must, he is taking all kinds of flak from right wing conservative war hawks in Congress, the military and the national media. They want him to accede to the general's request and do it immediately.

- Advertisement -

There is no easy answer to this very important decision. If he approves the McCrystal recommendations he will be blasted by the liberal Left and many Democratic moderates. If he decides not to add more troops, the bloodthirsty right-wingers will trash him unmercifully. So what is he to do? Well, I have a recommendation of my own for him that is different from the two paths before him; and what I recommend is something I would hope that he already is mulling over.

He must put aside the politics and base the decision strictly on what is in the best interests of the American people and, yes, also those millions of innocent Afghan civilians who are caught in the crossfire of the war. I know that this is a very difficult decision for our president as it is almost impossible to keep politics out of the equation. He does not want to be viewed as a weak president who cannot stand up to his military leaders. He also does not want to be seen as a weak president that refused to send more troops and endangered our troops on the ground.

Afghanistan has now become Obama's war and, if he escalates it further, there is almost no turning back. If he allows himself to be dominated and controlled by McCrystal and the Pentagon, this war may go on for years and years. As President Lyndon found out to his dismay in the Vietnam War, once you let the generals get the upper hand, it is almost impossible to regain control. Mr. Obama, you better think long and hard and ask yourself if you want this nation to be caught up in yet another quagmire. Yes, this is a time for the real change you promised America; this is no time to repeat the tragic, devastating errors of Vietnam.

President Obama now has two very important issues to settle, two critical decisions to make. He has to accept, reject or offer an alternative to General McCrystal's troop recommendations. Secondly, he has to decide if the he still can trust the general to follow his orders or whether he must send him down the fateful path taken by General Douglas MacArthur.

Very soon America will see exactly what this man, our president, is made of; is he just one more U.S. president who cannot stand up to the forces who promote endless war; or one who has the courage to do what is right, no matter what the consequences of his actions. This will truly be a defining moment in his presidency.

- Advertisement -


Michael Payne is an independent progressive activist. His writings deal with social, economic, political and foreign policy issues; and especially with the great dangers involved with the proliferation of perpetual war, the associated defense (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

Ethics and Morals in America; an Endangered Species

A U.S. President Defies Congress, the Constitution and the Will of the People; Will Impeachment Follow?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

that disobeying the Commander in Cheif during war ... by Ernest on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:03:08 AM
You are entirely right about McCrystal and I belie... by michael payne on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:21:44 AM
didn't ask Obama to go to Afghanistan to make a mi... by sommers on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:31:29 AM
He said it in public by leaking it to the press, t... by michael payne on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:06:55 AM
What is McChrystal smoking to think he can win wit... by John Lorenz on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:50:47 PM
Harry Truman's motto was: "The Buck Stops Here", a... by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:02:42 AM
You are right on about the dithering; sad to say, ... by michael payne on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:36:21 AM
Fire McChriystal for trying to usurp authority fro... by John Lorenz on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:48:04 PM
What could the President do if a portion of the mi... by gone on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:27:09 PM
Taxes ??... by sommers on Thursday, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:19:00 PM