Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

GOP Showed Its True Colors With Tax Deal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/8/10

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Although the President has been roundly and loudly criticized by the Progressive left for agreeing to a two-year extension of tax cuts for the űber-rich, this was probably the best deal he could have gotten under the circumstances.

In fact, the deal may be better than even he realized at the time because, in the deal-making process, he forced Republicans to reveal their real priorities, to show their true colors. 

And those colors are not red, white, and blue.

They're all shades of green.

Since Barack Obama's inauguration, Republicans have harped without surcease on the expanding budget deficit and the burgeoning national debt.

Of course, those same Republicans wanted tax cuts too, without ever specifying how both ends could be achieved.   In that, they were like a lot of American families who also can't figure out how to live on less or no income and still pay off their debts.

But Republicans were never really interested in trimming budget deficits or in reducing the national debt.   We have known that all along.   If they had been, they never would have agreed to eight years of Bush-sponsored budget deficits, two unfunded wars, multiple tax rate reductions, several tax rebates, Medicare Part D, the bank bailout, and more.

No, the Republicans' real interest was never the deficit or the debt.   They said they wanted tax cuts for the rich so as to avoid over-taxing the "job creators."   In truth, they wanted to make their rich friends richer, the public interest be damned.

Why?   Because those same rich, now unencumbered by restrictions on corporate campaign funding, underwrite the Republicans' political campaigns.   And, as they say in the south, "Ya gotta dance with the guy what brung ya."

And what were the Republicans willing to give up to gain a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts for the rich?

They were willing to give up tax cuts for everyone making less than $250,000 a year; a 13-month extension of unemployment benefits; a 2% cut in the payroll tax for a year; extension of the Earned Income, Child, and College Tuition tax credits; and additional tax breaks for businesses including, importantly, the ability to write off start-up investments.   They also agreed to the Lincoln-Kyl compromise on the estate tax.

Total value of the tax cuts for the rich: about $95 billion.   Total value of the deal: about $800 billion in foregone revenue.

Think of it: Republicans were willing to give up eight times as much as they got just to ensure that their rich friends got their tax breaks.

And Republicans want anybody to think they are committed in any way to reducing the budget deficit and the national debt?   Don't make me laugh: they just agreed to add $800 billion to it.

Let's be sure they own that in 2012.

 

Rick Wise is an industrial psychologist and retired management consultant. For 15 years, he was managing director of ValueNet International, Inc. Before starting ValueNet, Rick was director, corporate training and, later, director, corporate (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HOW TO AVOID THE UNION

WILL GOP REBUT OBAMA'S EDUCATION SPEECH?

A Conservative's "12 Days of Christmas"

"I Don't Want to Pay for Somebody Else's Health Care"

Reconsidering Iraq: What If We Had Been Greeted as Liberators?

FairTax: Too Good To Be True?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
I have no problem with giving tax breaks to the ri... by Richard Wise on Wednesday, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:33:39 AM