Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

GOP: Show Me the Money!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/21/14

Become a Fan
  (16 fans)

Combat Tax
(image by R B Shreve and Microsoft Office Clip Art)

This week we've heard various Neo-con war hawks, a veritable chorus of them, calling for Obama to take military action in Iraq. Most of these are the same people that urged us to invade on the false premise that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that were a real and present danger to the US. Dick Cheney and others prefaced their present call to arms by alluding to the number of people killed allegedly because of Obama's failure to act sooner.

Many progressive voices have called these hypocrites out for their obvious lack of remorse for the lives needlessly lost or ruined by the military actions they initiated and continue to advocate. But very few have proposed that Congress step up and fulfill its constitutional role: to deliberate and decide on a declaration of war. The hawks would like to urge others to act and avert accountability or risk to themselves.

I would like to see every American have skin in the game. If we are sending any armed personnel anywhere, Congress must ordain that all of us back the effort -- not indirectly but as directly and immediately as possible. In the past we have dodged shouldering the risks and costs. Under the guise of having an all-volunteer army, we have sent only the few who were patriotic enough to serve. We have enticed them with pay incentives, educational opportunities, promises of travel and adventure, and the prospect of an early retirement with generous health and financial benefits.

We've downplayed the prospect of physical and psychological disabilities. And, to our eternal shame, we have failed to ensure that the Veterans Administration runs efficiently for the benefit of those whose service leaves them less fit than when they first volunteered.

Equally shameful, we have undertaken our military adventures on credit. We have left the bill for future generations. They not only must pay the up-front costs, but also the interest on the debt. It's a cruel paradox that much of that interest goes to nations like China, nations that will one day be seen as economic and political adversaries to America.

Meanwhile here at home the richest and most prosperous among us enjoy low taxes relative to the benefit they derive from our American democracy. The also enjoy the choice not to serve in the military. Many of the hawks, like the infamous Richard "Dick" Cheney, deemed their personal careers too important to permit time out for military service. Of course many, also like Cheney, profited handsomely from enterprises that support US military actions.

It is high time that this obscene tradition end. I propose a COMBAT TAX. This tax would be an amount initially estimated by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to cover any proposed action involving armed government personnel. The estimate would be updated quarterly to reflect actual incurred costs. It would be added as a percentage, a surtax on all US Federal taxes across the board. Income tax, excise tax, gas tax -- every tax paid to the US Treasury. Each of us would feel the bite in the taxes withheld from out paychecks. We'd see it immediately in the cost of gas and luxury items we buy. We would all have skin in the game, every single one of us. Rich or poor, each of us would pay. (We might consider exempting income for the veterans who had seen combat.)

At the same time, the Combat Tax legislation would provide for universal service -- yes, I mean conscription. Every adult man or woman would be required to serve the nation in some capacity. Service could be in qualifying occupations like Teach America, Peace Corps, Volunteer Firefighter, Volunteer EMT, and the like. To provide more opportunity we could resurrect the Civilian Conservation Corps to help rebuild our rotting infrastructure. The idea would be that in addition to the monetary hit of the Combat Tax, there would be a universal investment of time and energy for the national good that was in some small way on a par with that made by our military personnel.

The end result of the Combat Tax would be total accountability. Each and every one of us would have a personal stake in assuring that the US never initiate combat unless a truly vital national interest were at risk. Moreover, all of us would have a stake in limiting the conflict and making sure there was an exit strategy.

I'd bet that none of the US wars of the last fifty years would have happened were a Combat Tax the law and the tradition of American democracy. My challenge to the GOP hawks is this: You want more war? Then declare it, and along with it enact the Combat Tax. GOP: Show me the money!

(Article changed on June 21, 2014 at 13:55)


Richmond Shreve is a citizen journalist and former Senior Editor at He is a published author of fiction (Lost River Anthology, Amazon) and training materials (Instructor Candidate Manual, and A retired (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The US is Broke -- Not!

Barstool Economics - A Viral Conservative Fable

Infiltrating the Truth Movement

What is Coffee Party USA?

Roots of Conspiracy Exposed

How I Became a "Bestselling" Author


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The idea of universally-required government servi... by Marguerite Chandler on Saturday, Jun 21, 2014 at 2:05:06 PM
What, like Bergdahl the traitor? ... by Bill Johnson on Monday, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:16:23 AM
But no Americans except the ever-fearful Republica... by Simon Leigh on Saturday, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:55:48 PM
"Why not restrict the tax to those who will richly... by Richmond Shreve on Saturday, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:13:34 PM
Ah hah! You haven't been listening to the GOP line... by Richmond Shreve on Sunday, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:39:03 AM
No-risk Combat? For virtually all the wealthy, and... by Richmond Shreve on Saturday, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:25:34 PM
Combat tax: Rich or poor, each of us would pay.Not... by Charles Roll on Saturday, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:15:51 PM
Of course the Combat Tax is imperfect, but suggest... by Richmond Shreve on Sunday, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:59:54 AM
Yes, we are 100% in agreement!Your idea for a comb... by Charles Roll on Sunday, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:18:37 PM
I think the Republications would disagree. No new... by Shirley Braverman on Monday, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:53:51 AM