Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

GOP Offers to Throw Middle Class, Elderly Over the "Fiscal Cliff"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 12/6/12

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
- Advertisement -

The Republican Party has a message for the American people: Meet the new deal, same as the old deal. The GOP "counter-offer" to the president's fiscal-cliff proposal isn't really an offer at all: It's a rehash of the tired and extremist right-wing economic warfare which the American people soundly rejected last month.

But a political tin ear is the least of the shortcomings Republicans bring to this debate. This rehash of their old, rejected budget ideas is a formula for reducing the United States of America to a crumbling and poverty-haunted land where the young have no opportunities, the middle class is struggling to survive, and the aged live in misery and fear.

Think we're exaggerating? Take a look at the details, such as they are, and decide for yourself.

The GOP's proposal attacks our health security on two separate fronts. First, their unspecified proposal for $800 billion in "tax reform" almost certainly includes cutting or eliminating the tax provisions which encourage employer health coverage, which currently covers most non-Medicare-eligible Americans. That would throw working Americans into the individual health-care market by the tens of millions, as their "tax reform" makes it financially unfeasible for their employers to keep providing health benefits.

The Republicans also propose to raise the Medicare eligibility age to 67, which would force 65- and 66-year-olds to seek private, individual health-care coverage on the open insurance market. And since they'd also repeal the new health-care law, these older Americans would get no help in that process. (Here are eight reasons raising the Medicare age is a terrible idea.)

I've analyzed health data from a number of U.S. employers, and health care costs begin to skyrocket for workers as they move from age 55 to 65. They rise even more steeply after that. The cost of covering these workers will make employers far more reluctant to hire older workers.

And they're going to be desperate to find jobs, since the Social Security age is already scheduled to rise to age 67 under current law -- a blow the GOP would worsen by cutting Social Security benefits for current as well as future retirees. They'd do that by using a lower formula to calculate cost-of-living adjustments -- a calculation that's already inadequate. (This will help you calculate how much this would affect you personally.)

- Advertisement -

This change would also affect disabled Americans and children on Social Security.

The $800 billion they're offering in "tax reform" is also likely to include cuts to tax deductions that are helping millions of middle-class Americans as they struggle to stay afloat. Likely targets include reducing or eliminating the home mortgage interest deduction, which could lead to millions of additional foreclosures, as well as an end to deductions for children.

The Republicans are also promising $300 billion in "other discretionary cuts." They don't say what they'd cut, but previous GOP Congressional budgets offer clues. Some of the cuts are absurd, like the massive reductions in funds for hurricane warnings. Are they serious? Law enforcement programs that pay for themselves, like U.S. Customs impoundment of drug vehicles? Honestly?

The GOP's massive cuts to anti-poverty programs would lead to increases in the number of poor Americans, including poor children, and a marked decrease in their health and quality of life. Other cuts would lead to a significant jump in unemployment. Still others would make it impossible for any but the most well-to-do young people to finance a college education.

If Republicans were really concerned about Federal deficits, they'd be allowing Medicare to negotiate prices with big pharmaceutical companies, which would save billions. Instead they're blocking it. And they'd be targeting the greed factor in for-profit health care companies, which is one of the leading reasons our country's health care costs are so much higher than those of other countries.

- Advertisement -

Instead, their last presidential standard-bearer led the way in investing in those kinds of companies, then pushing them so hard that several of them wound up committing Medicare fraud.

And if Republicans were really concerned about the deficit, they'd be raising rates on millionaires, billionaires and corporations, instead of proposing to gain new revenue by "tax-reforming" the middle class into penury.

Why propose such a socially destructive set of ideas? As the prosecutors ask, Cui bono? Who benefits? Under the GOP's proposal, Wall Street would get millions of new customers as Americans scramble to make up for the loss in future Social Security and Medicare benefits. Health insurers would also gain millions of new customers. And lower government expenditures means an even lower tax burden for millionaires, billionaires and giant corporations -- and they're the Republican Party's real constituencies.

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

The Price of Evil at JPMorgan Chase


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I find it remarkable Mr. Eskow, and that those of ... by Dr. Tom Baldwin on Friday, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:42:12 PM
responsible for their plan?... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:35:30 PM
"And if Republicans were really concerned about th... by Rixar13 on Friday, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:17:57 PM
"And if Republicans were really concerned about th... by Rixar13 on Friday, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:18:10 PM