Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/5/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (20 comments)

GMO Pushers and the Junkies They Create

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I remember when buying seed was simply buying seed. You went to the feed store and purchased as many bags of seed that you needed, paid for it, loaded it in your truck, and went home to plant: simple, effective, and economical. Seed was saved for the next year’s planting, and that was normal. Not so anymore. Now a simple farmer must sign a grower’s contract with agribusiness giants in order to gain permission to plant GM (Genetically Modified) crops, which gives the seed company the right to monitor his farming operation, go onto his property to take samples anytime and anywhere it wants to, and to literally shut his operation down for non-compliance with the contract.

The Agreement 

Why do farmers get tangled up in this mess? Probably because they have swallowed the lie that GM crops are beneficial, are thinking about higher profits, less work, and don’t take the time to read the fine print in the documents they sign. Now they are stuck. It’s either comply or go broke, and so the cycle continues.
 
Which brings me to the following question: when did we stop reading what we sign? Let me ask you a personal question. Do you read everything that you agree to whether it is in writing or via electronic medium? If you do, you are in the minority. Let’s take those agreements that we have to agree to every time we download a program. Do you read them? Do you go through all of the fine print and understand all of the terms and conditions? I didn’t think so. You’re not alone; neither does Congress. Not one Congressman read the entire Stimulus Package before it was signed. Reading the entire thing in as short a period as they were given was impossible. And so it is with farmers. Oh, they have the time to read the fine print, but do they?
 
I cannot imagine agreeing with the following statement that comes directly from the Monsanto Technology Use Agreement Terms and Conditions (TUA) for Roundup Ready Canola:  

READ MORE

 

http://farmwars.info

Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Really good info by amicus curiae on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:28:48 AM
Vicious cycle by Barbara Peterson on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:29:18 PM
please check your facts by Brad Mitchell on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:12:34 PM
GM Crops Linked to Rise in Pesticide Use by Barbara Peterson on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:03:19 PM
Brad, do you work for Monsanto? by Rebecca Dennis on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:37:30 PM
Yes, he does by Barbara Peterson on Tuesday, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:15:29 AM
And Simon Barber is his new lapdog by Michael Lusk on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:54:29 AM
Science vs pseudoscience by Robert Wager on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:55:52 PM
Are you paid by Monsanto also? by Barbara Peterson on Tuesday, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:13:29 AM
Yes I remember the conversation well by Robert Wager on Tuesday, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:38:49 PM
Lies, damn lies and statistics by Robert Wager on Tuesday, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:54:51 PM
The hawks have landed! by Marti Oakley on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:40:25 AM
PR can also be facts. by Robert Wager on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:21:56 PM
Monsanto PR by Marti Oakley on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:00:32 PM
Substantial equivalence by Robert Wager on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:30:55 PM
the rest of the world doesn't by Marti Oakley on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:10:58 AM
safety con't by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:08:38 PM
yields by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:42:44 PM
Glyphosate vs atrazine by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:11:39 PM
EIQ's by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:40:04 PM