Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

GMO Labeling Gets Local in Pennsylvania

By       Message Jon McGoran     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 2/18/13

- Advertisement -

Ever since October 2011, when the "Right to Know March" came through Philadelphia, I have been proud to be a part of the fight to label Genetically Modified Organisms(GMOs). I was one of the record one million USDA comments in support of a national GMO labeling policy. And I enthusiastically supported Proposition 37 in California.

But I'm not just about labeling GMOs. I'm also about local. That's why I'm so excited there is now a locally grown initiative to label GMOs in Pennsylvania, with groups like  GMO-Free PA at the forefront. This locally produced effort will have a smaller carbon footprint than one imported from across the country, and will be more attuned to our "local sensibilities" than a national effort.

Last month, Tom Laskawy wrote on Grist.org about how Walmart has been quietly advocating for a federal GMO labeling standard. Michele Simon now writes on Huffington Post that a national law could have some unanticipated downsides. Similarly, statewide initiatives could have some unintended upsides , as well. Local economies would benefit from sales of materials for picket signs and paper mache frankenfoods, and the multiplier effect is much higher when you buy local, meaning dollars spent on a local GMO labeling initiative have more benefit to the local economy than dollars spent on national initiatives. But  if California's Prop 37 is any indication, there could be a much bigger local impact. Opponents of that measure poured tens of millions of dollars into the state to defeat the measure. That kind of cash infusion could be the biggest economic boon to Pennsylvania since fracking.

There could be other benefits as well: Monsanto earns a couple billion dollars in profits each year, or more, so $50 million dollars in California or Pennsylvania is just a drop in the bucket. But if all 50 states started initiatives, at $50 million each, that's $2.5 billion. Even Monsanto might notice that.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.jonmcgoran.com

Jon McGoran is the author of six novels, including the ecological thrillers Drift, Deadout, and their forthcoming sequel Dust Up, which deal with today's biotech food industry. He has been writing about food and sustainability for over 20 years, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sustainable Agriculture Means Hope for Haiti

Science, Uncertainty, and Erring on the Safe Side

Speaking at the March Against Monsanto in Philadelphia

GMO Labeling Gets Local in Pennsylvania

Push to Label GE Foods Builds Nationally and in Dozens of States, Including Pennsylvania