Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

G&H : The Real Danger Facing Peace

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

It has been more than a year since I wrote my last article in Opednews. I guess I was taken by the speeding events in the Middle East, my part of the world, were events went beyond anyone's imagination. Who would have thought two years ago that a presidential debate will take place in Egypt or the Libyan people will be able to stand on the so-called Green Book with their feet.

But that was not my only reason. In all my previous articles, I was driven and motivated by an event to write.   Motivated may not be fair to describe my feelings. It was more of an emotional reaction to an incident that has affected me to the extent that words were fighting in the keyboard.

I have to confess that my writing skills are at their highest when I am reacting emotionally to an event, and I suppose this is what most of the readers want to read, an honest expression of the feelings provided common sense and logic are maintained. I can count a number of events that has forced me to go to the key board and write. The collapse of Saddam Hussein dictatorship, the inauguration of Barack Obama, The immediate and timely sacking of the Saudi   Secretary of Education after failure to save some students from a school fire, the killing of Saddam's Hussein's two dictator sons".etc.

Surprisingly the world reaction to the killing of Bin Laden didn't create emotions such as those created when the famous Paul Bremer's announcement ( We got'em -- (Saddam) ) was heard across the world, despite the fact that Bin Laden's crimes exceeded by a large margin those of Saddam.

Recently, I am more concerned with the unjustified, unwarranted cultural antagonism   between nations and religions. Such antagonism is not accidental, but, unfortunately is fueled by greed and hate. Let us call them G&H, the greatest danger to human survival and well-being. For example, Iran is promoting the Sunni/Shiite sectarian mutual hate because it wants Shiite people, wherever they are, to be loyal to Iran not their countries.

Another example, weapons factories would go broke if peace and harmony spread across the world. Therefore they may have interest in feeding sectarian and border disputes. It is interesting to analyze how both peace and non-peace can support the world economy but the difference is the former is long-term and the latter is short-term.

- Advertisement -

I believe the G part of G&H can be dealt with through dialogue and understanding each other's interest. Also victim nations realized the game they are being subjected to and took counter measures. It is the H part that is hard to get rid of.   People, to a large extent, are the production of an educational system that may have engraved in their minds certain superiority feelings or a negative picture of other cultures or religions.   This, combined with the not so innocent media nonstop degrading of these cultures and religions is a major contributor.

In my view, people of the world went through three stages.   In the fifties and sixties of last century, it was mainly naivety and ignorance, probably due to almost non-existence of people-to-people communications channels. The seventies are the beginning of the wake-up process where many social movements started, but the H factor didn't exist then.   You can travel anywhere in the world and feel safe and welcome.

It may be appropriate to conclude with the developments in the eighties until now where communication channels between people of the world grew up so fast until we got to cheap flights to anywhere in the world, mobile phones, internet and most notably now Skype and twitter, where some one in India can talk to some one in Brazil live anytime during the day free of charge. What puzzles me is that this is supposed to make us closer but, on the ground, the situation of cultural understanding is indeed getting worse not better.

Hamad S Alomar

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia       

- Advertisement -


Peace Loving Saudi Citizen

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Social Media's Collateral Damage

The Basel Committee and The Lamborghini

Starbucks, the American Pub

Where and When Does Freedom of Speech End ?

School of Dictatorship

American Model of Democracy Is Not The End of History


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I chose experimentally to impose another paradigm ... by molly cruz on Monday, May 14, 2012 at 10:26:59 AM
Many Thanks indeed for such a valuable expansion o... by Hamad S Alomar on Monday, May 14, 2012 at 6:30:10 PM