Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Fukushima: Third Anniversary of the Start of the Catastrophe

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 3/3/14

opednews.com

(Article changed on March 4, 2014 at 06:20)

From http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fukushima_I_reactor_unit_3_by_Digital_Globe.jpg: Fukushima I reactor unit 3 by Digital Globe
Fukushima I reactor unit 3 by Digital Globe
(image by Wikipedia)


  With the third anniversary of the start of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe coming next week, the attempted Giant Lie about the disaster continues--a suppression of information, an effort at dishonesty of historical dimensions.

It involves international entities, especially the International Atomic Energy Agency, national governmental bodies--led in Japan by its current prime minister, the powerful nuclear industry and a "nuclear establishment" of scientists and others with a vested interest in atomic energy.

   Deception was integral to the push for nuclear power from its start. Indeed, I opened my first book on nuclear technology, Cover Up: What You Are Not Supposed to Know About Nuclear Power, with:   "You have not been informed about nuclear power. You have not been told. And that has been done on purpose. Keeping the public in the dark was deemed necessary by the promoters of nuclear power if it was to succeed. Those in government, science and private industry who have been pushing nuclear power realized that if people were given the facts, if they knew the consequences of nuclear power, they would not stand for it."

   Published in 1980, the book led to my giving many presentations on nuclear power at which I've often heard the comment that only when catastrophic nuclear accidents happened would people fully realize the deadliness of atomic energy.

Well, massive nuclear accidents have occurred--the 1986 Chernobyl disaster and the Fukushima catastrophe that began on March 11, 2011 and is ongoing with large discharges of radioactive poisons continuing to spew out into the environment.  

Meanwhile, the posture of the nuclear promoters is denial--insisting the impacts of the Fukushima catastrophe are essentially non-existent. A massive nuclear accident has occurred and they would make believe it hasn't.

"Fukushima is an eerie replay of the denial and controversy that began with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki," wrote Yale University Professor Emeritus Charles Perrow in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists last year. "This is the same nuclear denial that also greeted nuclear bomb tests, plutonium plant disasters at Windscale in northern England and Chelyabinsk in the Ural Mountains, and the nuclear power plant accidents at Three Mile Island in the United States and Chernobyl in what is now Ukraine." click here

The difference with Fukushima is the scale of disaster. With Fukushima were multiple meltdowns at the six-nuclear plant site. There's been continuing pollution of a major part of Japan, with radioactivity going into the air, carried by the winds to fall out around the world, and gigantic amounts of radioactivity going into the Pacific Ocean moving with the currents and carried by marine life that ingests the nuclear toxins.

Leading the Fukushima cover-up globally is the International Atomic Energy Agency, formed by the United Nations in 1957 with the mission to " seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world."   http://www.iaea.org/About/statute.html#A1.2  

Of the consequences of the Fukushima disaster, "To date no health effects have been reported in any person as a result of radiation exposure from the accident," declared the IAEA in 2011, a claim it holds to today.   http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/missionsummary010611.pdf

   Working with the IAEA is the World Health Organization. WHO was captured on issues of radioactivity and nuclear power early on by IAEA. In 1959, the IAEA and WHO, also established by the UN, entered into an agreement--that continues to this day--providing that IAEA and WHO "act in clo se co-operation with each other" and " whenever either organization proposes to initiate a program or activity on a subject in which the other organization has or may have a substantial interest, the first party shall consult the other with a view to adjusting the matter by mutual agreement." click here

   The IAEA-WHO deal has meant that "WHO cannot undertake any research, cannot disseminate any information, cannot come to the assistance of any population without the prior approval of the IAEA...WHO, in practice, in reality, is subservient to the IAEA within the United Nations family," explained Alison Katz who for 18 years worked for WHO, on Libbe HaLevy's "Nuclear Hotseat" podcast last year.

On nuclear issues "there has been a very high level, institutional and international cover-up which includes governments, national authorities, but also, regrettably the World Health Organization," said Katz on the program titled, "The WHO/IAEA--Unholy Alliance and Its Lies About Int'l Nuclear Health Stats." http://afaz.at/downloads/2013/2013_09_trscript_nucl_hotseat_katz_final.pdf

   Katz is now with an organization called IndependentWHO which works for "the complete independence of the WHO from the nuclear lobby and in particular from its mouthpiece which is the International Atomic Energy Agency. We are demanding that independence," she said, "so that the WHO may fulfill its constitutional mandate in the area of radiation and health."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.karlgrossman.com

Karl Grossman is a professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury and host of the nationally syndicated TV program Enviro Close-Up.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New Book Concludes: Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer

Siemens' Abandoning Nuclear Power

Murdoch Media Empire: A Journalistic Travesty

Fukushima: A Month of Media Disinformation

What Could Truly End the Space Program: A Nuclear Disaster Overhead

The Cancer Epidemic: Its Environmental Causes

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thank you for reminding us all about the "900 poun... by Ralph Fucetola JD on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:27:20 AM
So why is the media not reporting some interesting... by Tim Mullins on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:02:20 PM
There is practically no way to realistically over... by Rima E Laibow MD on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:05:45 AM
First, allow me to say that I agree with you.That ... by Tim Mullins on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:54:43 PM
What our government won't tell us about the devast... by sharsand on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:54:21 AM
This is rapidly becoming one of the issues of the ... by Tim Mullins on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:45:36 PM
It's pretty hard to believe that it's been 3 year... by Bob Davey on Monday, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:39:18 PM
  If we put this world wide moratorium on chi... by Bob Gormley on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:05:26 AM
Energy consumption rises in step with demand and ... by Bob Davey on Tuesday, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:58:28 AM
The truth can be bad for business. ... by John Rachel on Thursday, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:00:16 PM