Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 21 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (27 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Fukushima: A Month of Media Disinformation

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Valuable 5   Well Said 4  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 4/11/11

- Advertisement -

By Karl Grossman

            Today marks exactly a month since the nuclear power disaster in Japan began. Along with the ongoing discharges of radioactivity from the Fukushima nuclear plant complex, there has been a largely outrageous flow of media coverage.

            Brian Williams on NBC Nightly News on April 6th asked a good question: "And what about all that water, the many million gallons of it, highly radioactive, dumped in the Pacific Ocean for days on end--and we've all been told it will dissipate. But how can this not be harmful?" he queried correspondent Miguel Almaguer.

            The question might have been good but the response to it, Almaguer's report, was far from that. He presented a talking head expert, Luca Centurioni of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who said: "No, there is no immediate danger." (Centurioni's background, according to his resume posted on the Internet, reflects no background in radioactivity.)

            "The bottom line," said Almaguer, "experts are in agreement there's no threat to our water or our food." He added: "And as you can see Brian, California's coastline is as beautiful as ever." Radioactivity, of course, is invisible.

  Or consider Charles Osgood on "The Osgood File" on CBS radio on April 1--stressing that there was nothing to fear but fear.   Indeed, he played President Franklin D. Roosevelt's declaration in 1933 that "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." That might have been a reasonable reassurance amid the Depression. But here were the first indications of radioactivity having come to the U.S. from Japan.with radioactive iodine being "found in milk in the states of California and Washington," noted Osgood.

But, he quickly added, "the contamination is described as miniscule, posing no threat to the public." To bolster that assertion he presented Blair Thompson, "spokesman for the Washington Dairy Products Commission."

"Radiation can be a scary word, but I think it's important to remember that actually we live surrounded by radiation every day," said milk industry PR man Thompson.

- Advertisement -

Indeed, chirped Osgood: "Some of our most common foods--potatoes, carrots, bananas and Brazil nuts--contain radioactive potassium."

Yes, there is naturally occurring "background radiation" of various sorts--and that   causes a level of cancer. As the Nuclear Information and Resource Service ( states: "Even exposure to background radiation causes some cancers. Additional exposures cause additional risks." Cited is a 700-page 2005 National Academy of Sciences report, "Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation," that concluded that:   "There is no safe level or threshold of ionizing radiation exposure." There have been numerous similar reports.

And not only were reporter after reporter over the past month unaware of the facts about radioactivity, the experts they presented were quite a crew, too.

Consider David Brenner. He was on PBS Nightly News on March 18, two days after being featured in the New York Times story about him headlined: "Countering Radiation Fears With Just the Facts." In the article, he was quoted as saying "I think there is a role for safe nuclear power." Just a fact?   Clearly, he was ready for TV, too.

Asked by Jeffrey Brown about "the plutonium found in the ground" around the Fukushima nuclear plants, Dr. Brenner, director of the Center for Radiological Research at Columbia University, responded: "Well, there are various sources that the plutonium could have come from. But I think we're relieved that the levels of plutonium are actually very low, and actually, typical of plutonium--natural plutonium contamination in this country."

- Advertisement -

Plutonium is the most lethal of all radioactive substances. There is no level "actually very low." A millionth of a gram inhaled, a microscopic particle, is all that's needed to produce lung cancer. Furthermore, there is no "natural plutonium contamination in this country."

Plutonium is a manmade substance. It was discovered by Glenn Seaborg in 1941 and used in the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki and almost all atomic weapons since. Plutonium-239 is what Uranium-238 can become when in the proximity of fission.

Nuclear power plants build up 500 to 1,000 pounds of plutonium every year. Indeed, the concept for nuclear power plants came from the plutonium production reactors built at the Hanford reservation in the state of Washington during the Manhattan Project crash program of World War II to build atomic bombs. Also produced in those reactors were large amounts of heat. With the war over, seeking to do more with nuclear technology than just build more nuclear weapons, the scientists, engineers and corporate contractors of the Manhattan Project--which became the Atomic Energy Commission--pushed a scheme to use that heat to boil water to turn a turbine and generate electricity.

Next Page  1  |  2

Karl Grossman is a professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury and host of the nationally syndicated TV program Enviro Close-Up.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New Book Concludes: Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer

Siemens' Abandoning Nuclear Power

Murdoch Media Empire: A Journalistic Travesty

Fukushima: A Month of Media Disinformation

What Could Truly End the Space Program: A Nuclear Disaster Overhead

The Cancer Epidemic: Its Environmental Causes


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

like I said in my article  Get Ready for The... by Rob Kall on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:56:28 AM
And again: We have by far, the largest criminal an... by Ned Lud on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:16:55 PM
Prepare for departure with ten guiding principles.... by Mike Preston on Tuesday, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:51:03 PM
Kari is so correct in her analysis of this disaste... by James Hadstate on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:59:24 AM
The world must get a clue that this reckless techn... by Joe Giambrone on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:06:47 AM
Well, disinformation happen with Katrina.. Why sho... by Karine Aguilar on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:31:51 PM
Is the flow of dis/misinformation coming out of Fu... by Sister Begonia on Tuesday, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:19:11 PM
Thank you for participating in this discussion, Si... by John Peebles on Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:49:38 PM