Tags for This Article:

Law (989)  Bush Enemy Of Civil Liberties (593)  Bush War Czar (212)  People Judy Miller (6)  Lindauer (5) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 24, 2008 at 00:04:09

Headlined on 6/24/08:
From the People Who Brought Us Judith Miller and George Bush

by Michael Collins     Page 1 of 4 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

From the People Who Brought Us
Judith Miller & George Bush

[[duo]]
Former New York New York Times reporter, Judith Miller, who wrongly
claimed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and her president.
(Images
left, right)

The New York Times "Covers" the Susan Lindauer Hearing

Michael Collins
"Scoop" Independent News
Washington, DC

The New York Times disgraced itself and betrayed the citizens of the United States when it repeatedly headlined misleading stories by reporter Judith Miller that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The paper issued a meandering apology well after the 2003 invasion prompted by the inaccurate reporting of Miller, the self-styled "Miss Run Amok" reporter, and others. But it was too little and too late to correct the damage. And it seems the Times is still running amok at the expense of what's in the public interest.

One has to wonder if the New York Times and the White House coordinated efforts on the WMD matter. They certainly worked very well together, propping up in tandem the fear-based prophecy of a menacing Saddam who would deliver his nuclear filled hate to our shores. This was total nonsense, to put it kindly.

We know that the Bush administration and the New York Times editor, William Keller, communicated about a very sensitive matter before the 2004 election. New York Times reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau had discovered that the Bush administration had been illegally wiretapping citizens since Sept. 11, 2001. "Internal discussions about drafts of the article had been 'dragging on for weeks' before the Nov. 2 election, Mr. Keller acknowledged," according to an article by Times public editor Byron Calme Instead of publishing the story, Times editor Keller killed and barred the story from public release until December 16, 2006, 13 months after the 2004 election.

Was this a coincidence? Not at all. Bush requested the story be killed for "national security" reasons. Forgetting the paper's shining moment when it released the Pentagon Papers, Keller willingly complied.

This was the election that would determine if Mr. Bush would have another four years to work the magic that's brought the nation to its current state of peril. When the story finally broke, it created a wave of negative reaction across the political spectrum.

Thanks to the New York Times' deliberate delay, we'll never know how the public would have responded just weeks before the 2004 vote. Based on the public response when the story was released, it may well have created enough of a shift to render the dirty tricks of Ohio and elsewhere meaningless.

The false WMD reports represented propaganda of the most frightening type. It came from reporter Miller who had relied largely on one source, Ahmad Chalabi. He was on the Defense Department payroll at the time that reporter Miller gained the WMD information from him. Without any doubt, the New York Times was a major enabler of the Iraq invasion and occupation.

By withholding a most devastating indictment of the lawless regime in power, namely illegal wiretapping of U.S. citizens, the New York Times denied citizens the option of a fully informed choice in 2004 and it played a major role in returning Bush-Cheney to power.

Four thousand U.S. deaths, tens of thousands of life long injuries to U.S. troops, 1.2 million dead Iraqis due to civil strife triggered by the war, 5 million Iraqi orphans, and the loss of United States' prestige on a massive scale: this is the shared legacy of the New York Times coverage leading up to the Iraq invasion. A nation on the verge of bankruptcy, foreclosures at epidemic rates, national debt so out of control it is difficult to even measure and a deep recession with possibly worse down the road: this is just a part of the legacy of the New York Times' coverage of the 2004 election.

How low will they sink?

Even on a smaller scale, their depths are without limits, it would seem.

The most recent example is the New York Times' coverage of the competency hearing on June 17, 2008 in the Susan Lindauer versus the United States in the Federal District Court, Southern District of New York, in lower Manhattan. Antiwar Activist Returns to Court for Iraq Spy Case, Alan Feuer, New York Times, June 18, 2008.

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://electionfraudnews.com

Michael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. See this summary of his articles plus Election 2004: The Urban Legend and groundbreaking research and commentary in "" His web site, Election Fraud News & The Money Party, offers a collection of resources and commentary on critical issues facing the country.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments

Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."
John Sanchez Jr.Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Here is my comment regarding the Times...

from another article appearing below.

Has Rupert Murdoch purchased the Times?

First the hire of PNAC's Bill Kristol and the consequent retraction interval timed with a stopwatch, now we see this tripe masquerading as some sort of expose.

What is wrong with advisors with an interest in ethanol? Doesn't it comport with the Times' preference for a Big Oil agenda? It seems to me that most proposals advanced by a candidate or their staff in developing alternatives to petroleum should be applauded. I'm sure the Times has done so with John McCain's ridiculous proposal to offer a third of a billion dollar X prize for new battery technology.

It seems that the Old Grey Lady is well advanced into her dotage. With a demonstrated inability to advance into the future without lurching to the right, perhaps she will soon become the New Grey Ghost.

by John Sanchez Jr. (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 1055 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 2:09:06 AM
 


Michael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. See this summary of his articles plus Election 2004: The Urban Legend and groundbreaking research and commentary in "" His web site, Election Fraud News & The Money Party, offers a collection of resources and commentary on critical issues facing the country.
Michael CollinsMichael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. See this summary of his articles plus Election 2004: The Urban Legend and groundbreaking research and commentary in "" His web site, Election Fraud News & The Money Party, offers a collection of resources and commentary on critical issues facing the country.

They're endorsing their own agenda

Which is the dance of supplication to those in power.  What else explains Keller's "fix" for Bush by withholding the 2004 domestic spying on citizens story?  Nothing and they have no excuse for their coverage of energy.  As you say,  they may be in business but they're quickly becoming a ghost, aside from occasional outbreaks of ratoinality, quickly withdrawn.

by Michael Collins (89 articles, 13 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 329 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 2:40:44 PM
 


Kathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies. She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.
Kathlyn StoneKathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies. She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.

Thanks for holding them accountable

Someone at the Times should have had the brains to kill THIS story, not the one in October 2004 that could have salvaged so much.

It's really quite remarkable that the NYT has learned nothing and carries apparently no remorse from the Miller-Chalabi fiasco and continues to smear its own reputation.

by Kathlyn Stone (39 articles, 213 quicklinks, 23 diaries, 595 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 10:01:57 AM
 


I am a retired forensic psychologist living in Los Angeles with enough time on my hands to have spent the past few years studying the deeds whose perpetrators pejoratively deride the correct analysis of which as "conspiracy theories," i.e., USG intelligence community domestic covert operations -- fascist politics by unconventional means.  A professor of analytic philosophy in a former career, I no longer embrace the Lotus Land argument that if you can work on y...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Michael GreenI am a retired forensic psychologist living in Los Angeles with enough time on my hands to have spent the past few years studying the deeds whose perpetrators pejoratively deride the correct analysis of which as "conspiracy theories," i.e., USG intelligence community domestic covert operations -- fascist politics by unconventional means.  A professor of analytic philosophy in a former career, I no longer embrace the Lotus Land argument that if you can work on y...

to see more of bio, click on member name

What is the "New York Times" up to?

Michael Collins wonders why the NYT provides such biased coverage of the competence hearing of Susan Lindauer.  The answer is simple. 

Like all other major media in the United States, the NYT is intimately wired into the USG intelligence community (USGIC) that serves it and that it in turn must protect.   Lindauer's central claim is that she functioned as a USGIC asset -- surely for the faction of that community that opposed the Iraq war and that was not happy in 2000 about their plans to stage 911.  The interests of the intelligence community, and the ruling class that staged 911 lies in her silence, to which end Mukasey (presumably) honored the claim that she was not competent to stand trial but declined to force her to take anti-psychotic drugs.  (The purpose of administering such drugs would be to damage her irremediably, not help her.)

The right-wing has decided to force the trial and to discredit Ms. Lindauer, to which end she must be first deemed both mentally incompetent and presumably capable of being made competent to stand trial by forced administration of said drugs.  The failure of such a "good faith" effort to bring her back to sanity at one of the CIA-sponsored psychiatric wards will be "deeply regretted" by the prosecution. 

The likely truth of the matter is that she is perfectly sane and is telling the truth.  She did, after all, predict 911 in some specificity and she is also stating that she was impersonated by another at the lunch meeting with Iraqis where the other "Susan Lindauer" accepted gratuities -- such a hamburger!! -- for doing their bidding.  She mocks the legal contrivance that the hamburger -- which she never ate -- is worth years in prison even if she had eaten it.  

Susan Lindauer, who was an asset of the USGIC faction that wanted to stop 911, is a threat to the folk who actively did it and they want her out of the way.  The NYT position is to protect the intelligence community that planned and implemented 911 by making her out to be crazy.  Keep your eye on Alan Feuer for similar assignments.

by Michael Green (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 8 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 3:08:03 PM
 


Recently retired activist with an MA in Public Policy from an Ivy League school. A born again believer who also believes in the separation of church and state and is outraged that the Word of the Lord has been highjacked to justify the actions of the current administration.
macdon1Recently retired activist with an MA in Public Policy from an Ivy League school. A born again believer who also believes in the separation of church and state and is outraged that the Word of the Lord has been highjacked to justify the actions of the current administration.

What Is American Becoming?

I seem to remember that during the cold war era the soviets put a lot of dissidents they wanted to discredit in insane asylums and also drugged them. Their propaganda machine then disseminated the story to the masses to convince them that anyone who opposed the regime was crazy and delusional.  If the people were ever released their brains were so burned out they were incapable of uttering a coherant statement. Food for thought....

by macdon1 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 89 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 4:06:41 PM
 


Michael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. See this summary of his articles plus Election 2004: The Urban Legend and groundbreaking research and commentary in "" His web site, Election Fraud News & The Money Party, offers a collection of resources and commentary on critical issues facing the country.
Michael CollinsMichael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. See this summary of his articles plus Election 2004: The Urban Legend and groundbreaking research and commentary in "" His web site, Election Fraud News & The Money Party, offers a collection of resources and commentary on critical issues facing the country.

Thanks so much

I continue to be impressed with the quality of comment on this and other articles on this story. Your points are strong and worthy of careful consideration.

The contradictions here are astounding. She's "delusional" about her role as a U.S. asset and activities but she's guilty of engaging in those activities and knowinly serving as an unregistered agent (not 'spy').  When did she become delusional?  Before the activities, in which case, she's innocent by the governments allegation of delusions.  If after arrest, how does that happen?  Delusions caused by federal incarceration?

She engaged in the activities charged illegally but wrote about them in the 10 letters to Card? Why would she outline them to the White House chief of staff if she were a foreign agent.

Innocent until proven guilty. She wants a trial. Not unreasonable in this country, is it?

by Michael Collins (89 articles, 13 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 329 comments) on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 1:41:18 PM
 


In 2004, Rady Ananda began contributing to the Web, as part of the growing community of citizen journalists. Focusing mainly on elections, her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a legal investigator for lawfirms, and about 5 years as an editor. She currently serves as a senior editor at OpEdNews.

All material offer...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rady AnandaIn 2004, Rady Ananda began contributing to the Web, as part of the growing community of citizen journalists. Focusing mainly on elections, her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a legal investigator for lawfirms, and about 5 years as an editor. She currently serves as a senior editor at OpEdNews.

All material offer...

to see more of bio, click on member name

And the domestic spying began at least 7 months pre 9-11

In NSA Domestic Surveillance Began 7 Months Before 9/11, Convicted Qwest CEO Claims Ryan Singel writes on October 11, 2007:

Did the NSA's massive call records database program pre-date the terrorist attacks of 9/11?That startling allegation is in court documents released this week which show that former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio -- the head of the only company known to have turned down the NSA's requests for Americans' phone records -- tried, unsuccessfully, to argue just that in his defense against insider trading charges.

Nacchio was sentenced to 6 years in prison in 2007 after being found guilty of illegally selling shares based on insider information that the company's fortunes were declining.  Nacchio unsuccessfully attempted to defend himself by arguing that he actually expected Qwest's 2001 earnings to be higher because of secret NSA contracts, which, he contends, were denied by the NSA after he declined in a February 27, 2001 meeting to give the NSA customer calling records, court documents released this week show.    

by Rady Ananda (97 articles, 246 quicklinks, 19 diaries, 696 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 5:08:17 PM
 

 

11 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Librarians Against Sarah Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Falujah Veteran is Attacked by McCain Republicans at Speech by Dean Powers

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular