Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 10/8/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Foreclosuregate

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (95 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Here's an abridgment of the first part of a new article by Ellen Brown writing at http://www.truth-out.org:

Wall Street banks are voluntarily suspending foreclosure proceedings in 23 states.

It would appear that the voluntary suspension of foreclosures is underway to review simple, careless, procedural errors -- errors which the conscientious banks are hastening to correct.

However, those errors go far deeper than mere sloppiness; they are concealing a massive fraud. They cannot be corrected with legitimate paperwork, and that was the reason the servicers had to hire "foreclosure mills" to fabricate the documents in the first place. These errors involve perjury and forgery -- fabricating documents that never existed and swearing to the accuracy of "facts" that were fiction.

Karl Denninger at MarketTicker is calling it "Foreclosuregate." Diana Ollick of CNBC calls it "the RoboSigning Scandal." On Monday, Ollick reported rumors that the government is planning a 90-day foreclosure moratorium to deal with the problem.

Three large mortgage issuers -- JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and GMAC -- have voluntarily suspended thousands of foreclosures, and a number of calls have been made for investigations.

Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray announced on Wednesday that he is filing suit against Ally Financial and GMAC for civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation and there have been thousands of violations -- for fraud in hundreds of foreclosure suits.

These problems cannot be swept under the rug as mere technicalities. They go to the heart of the securitization process itself. And this snowball has just started to roll.

Consider the incriminating price list from a company called DocX that specializes in "document recovery solutions." DocX is the technology platform used by Lender Processing Services to manage a national network of foreclosure mills. The price list includes such things as:

"Create Missing Intervening Assignment," $35;

"Cure Defective Assignment," $12.95;

"Recreate Entire Collateral File," $95.

"Create" here means fabricate documents out of whole cloth. And look at the extent of the offerings: The collateral file is ALL the documents the trustee needs to have pursuant to its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement on behalf of the mortgage-backed security holder. This refers the original of the note (the borrower IOU), copies of the mortgage (the lien on the property), the securitization agreement, and title insurance.

But how do you legally recreate the original note if you don't have it? And all this illegal fabrication of documents for one flat fee!

Understand the broader implication of this: Understand that all of the mortgages in question were "securitized" -- turned into Mortgage Backed Securities (MBSs) and were then fraudulently sold off to investors. MBSs are typically pooled through a type of "special purpose vehicle" called a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit or "REMIC," which has strict requirements defined under the US Internal Revenue Code (the Tax Reform Act of 1986). The REMIC holds the mortgages in trust, and issues securities representing an undivided interest in them.

Mortgages are pooled into REMIC Trusts as a tax avoidance measure, and to qualify, the properties must be properly conveyed to the trustee of the REMIC in the year the MBS is set up, with all the paperwork that's necessary to show a complete chain of title. For some reason, however, that was not done; and now there is no legitimate way to create those conveyances (i.e. the paperwork that's necessary to show a complete chain of title), because the time limit allowed under the Tax Code has passed.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.TechEditingServices.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Free rent for home 'owners' who can't pay? by Richard Clark on Friday, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:07:25 AM
Relevant excerpt from Stephen Lendman's recent article by Richard Clark on Monday, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:51:53 PM
Trillons in real estate with unknown/unproveable ownership by Richard Clark on Sunday, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:48:27 PM
Foreclosuregate by Bruce Morgan on Sunday, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:37:39 PM
What about this as an alternative solution: by Richard Clark on Monday, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:38:47 AM