Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  3
Share on Facebook
  8
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 11 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Flim flam Fiscal Cliff Legislation

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (191 fans)

opednews.com

Flim Flam Fiscal Cliff Legislation

Congress enacted scam legislation.

by Stephen Lendman

Senate members met, debated, negotiated, passed stopgap legislation, and largely delayed deficit cutting for later. 

On Tuesday, the House followed suit. Obama will sign it into law or may already have done so.

Media reports announced it. The New York Times headlined "Senate Passes Legislation to Allow Taxes on Affluent to Rise." Members voted 89-8.

The Washington Post said "Obama, Senate Republicans reach agreement on 'fiscal cliff.' "

The Wall Street Journal headlined "US Budget Compromise Deal Reached."

A New York Times editorial called it "A Tepid Fiscal Agreement." As this is written, House up or down follow-through awaits. Expect House Republicans to back strong party-line Senate support.

Speaker Boehner said "The House will honor its commitment to consider the Senate agreement if it is passed." 

Doing so overwhelmingly assures support. Republicans know they have much to answer for if millions of constituents lose benefits. 

Obama did what he does best. He lied. He said "this agreement is the right thing to do for our country, and the House should pass it without delay." 

It will "grow the economy and shrink our deficits in a balanced way," he claimed.

It's economic effect is negative. With or without cuts, deficits will grow exponentially. Addressing them was largely left for later. Whatever's agreed will resolve nothing.

The Times called the agreement "a weak brew that remains far too generous to the rich, and fails to bring in enough revenue to deal with the nation's deep need for public investments."
.

Provisions include raising personal income taxes to Clinton-era levels. Doing so affects families earning over $450,000 and individuals making more than $400,000. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act

Daniel Estulin's "True Story of the Bilderberg Group" and What They May Be Planning Now

Continuity of Government: Coup d'Etat Authority in America

America Facing Depression and Bankruptcy

Lies, Damn Lies and the Murdoch Empire

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I'm so fed up with the fear drama that the governm... by Marta B on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:43:06 AM