Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Firm Subpoenaed in Vote Tally

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Nikita Stewart and Mary Pat Flaherty  Posted by Roy Lipscomb (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Firm Subpoenaed in Vote Tally

Errors Add to Election Board's Concerns About November.


By Nikita Stewart and Mary Pat Flaherty
Washington Post Staff Writers

Friday, September 19, 2008

[Excerpts]

More than a week after the D.C. primary, the elections board has not fully explained what caused major errors in initial vote tallies, prompting D.C. Council member Mary Cheh to issue a subpoena for records from the California-based company that supplies the city with its voting equipment and software.



And an audit of four random precincts yesterday was troubling to voting advocates when the numbers still didn't add up.

...

Initially, the board blamed a defective cartridge at Precinct 141, on U Street NW, which officials said added thousands of phantom write-in votes to multiple races. Murphy said yesterday that workers ran the same cartridges through the same program but arrived at three different results.

...

By the end of the day, the employees had finished counting the ballots from three of the precincts and compared them with the results on tapes -- similar to cash register receipts -- produced Tuesday night.

None of them matched.

...

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

[Comment from the poster of this article] by Roy Lipscomb on Saturday, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:42:05 AM
Uh, Roy, you forgot to mention that..... by Mark E. Smith on Saturday, Sep 20, 2008 at 3:09:48 AM
Voting by Margaret Denson on Saturday, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:07:32 PM
Voting by Roy Lipscomb on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:04:39 PM
"Uh, Roy, you forgot to mention that....." by Roy Lipscomb on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:15:27 PM