Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/13/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (23 comments)

Finding Common Ground With Teapartiers

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Several times, in recent months, I've had face to face conversations with teapartiers. The settings were NOT political. The conversations WENT political and each time, we were able to find common ground.



When I'm talking to a suburban white man who's over 40, I can just about be sure he's a conservative. Accuse me of stereotyping, but I'm almost always proven right. I was going to add the caveat that he have short hair, but no, not really.

So, lately, when I have these conversations, I look for areas of agreement. We start off with Obama. He sucks. He's a liar. Sure, we come to this from different perspectives, but the agreement starts there. (Obama lied that he was supportive of single payer. He cut a deal with insurers and big pharma early on that he'd protect them. Big knife stab in our backs.)

I bring up the world trade organization, NAFTA, CAFTA and say they have to go, that they're destroying American industries. Bingo-- agreement.

Monopoly protection for insurers? Time to get rid of it. Bingo. They agree. Maybe even get rid of it for baseball too.


Corporate personhood? Should corporations be allowed the same rights as real humans. Flop!! Libertarian ideas of rights of money, rights for all kick in, Not sure we'll find common ground there. Too bad.

Regulations for finance industry? Umm, there's that libertarian thing again-- leave 'em alone the libertarian teapartiers say (i correct myself from saying teabagger.)

How about that congress? Definitely agreement there. They suck. IN my conversation yesterday, the gentleman suggests we vote out all the incumbents. That would elect a Republican congress, unless a lot of independents won.

Term limits on members of congress-- generally, there's agreement.

Election finance reform? Probably less if any agreement.

The Healthcare reform bill? Big agreement-- It's a loser, a rip-off. Here, of course, we come from very different perspectives, but we do have agreement.

States rights for health care reform. Definitely some agreement here. Guess what. Dennis Kucinich is working on legislation for this. Let's hope he writes it so it will win the Republican votes necessary for it to pass.

Ron Paul? There's a lot I disagree with about him, but at least I really know where he stands. I like the idea of closing hundreds of overseas bases and getting out of Iraq and Iran. I like canceling our membership in WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA. Sure he has policies I disdain, but we're talking here about finding common ground.

Making it easier and fairer for third party candidates-- big agreement.

I think it's worth trying to talk to teapartiers more. Theoretically, when I think of these folks in my head, they are horrible, redneck, right wing extremists. But when I actually talk to them, they are civil, intelligent people with different points of view, middle class, struggling people facing many of the same challenges we all face. Sure, we have some huge areas of disagreement, but then, invariably, we find areas where we agree.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

a new situation. We need to keep open to new opportunities by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:07:09 AM
thank you by peggyn on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:23:47 PM
My experience with Teapartiers by Scott Baker on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:17:55 AM
Need an Anti-Corruption Party by Adam Smith on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:21:52 AM
First, I would say by marko polo on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:36:07 AM
Breaking the stranglehold of the duopoly. by Jay Farrington on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:52:50 PM
The silent majority by Dick Thomson on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:58:26 PM
Anti-IMF crowd by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:02:51 PM
One Year Ago by wagelaborer on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:55:26 AM
By the Way by wagelaborer on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:06:49 AM
Coming Full Circle by Kahukugirl on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:29:32 AM
Great article. Great idea. by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:41:27 AM
MYTH and REALITY. DO YOU HAVE A PLAN? by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:48:44 AM
duopoly, Duopoly, DUOPOLY by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:56:29 AM
Good points by Dick Thomson on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:11:23 PM
It is instructive to note... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:43:49 AM
In the Epolitics world a little chilling out is in order by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:56:17 AM
Experience with the cult by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:56:35 AM
Interesting Idea, But Does It Avoid A Fundamental Question by James Hadstate on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:52:32 PM
Why find "common ground"? by Elaine Brower on Wednesday, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:21:06 PM
Anyone want to discuss the 50-states solution? by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:36:38 AM
Maybe we can unite on the issue of corruption by Perry Logan on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:57:55 AM
i have no problem with the tea partiers by peggyn on Thursday, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:21:20 PM