Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Female Fodder for the War Machine, Ban to be Lifted on Women in Combat

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Group(s): , Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/24/13

- Advertisement -

Cap't Sara Rodriguez of the 101st Airborne Division walks through the woods during the expert field medical badge testing at Fort Campbell, KY. on May 9, 2012 (Kirstin M. Hall/AP)

Well there it was in this morning's newspaper headline, "Women to get combat role." [i]

Sometime today, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will announce the lifting of the ban on women in combat. A Defense official characterized it as "opening up hundreds of thousands of additional front-line jobs to them".

Implementation is to be done as "quickly as possible" according to a military official but it will take some 3 years before all the services can fully implement the combat role for women.

Apparently Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin E. Dempsey wrote in a January 9 th letter to Panetta stating, "The time has come to rescind the direct combat exclusion rule for women and to eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service."

The question is, why now? Did a light bulb go off in Dempsey's head and instinctively he thought this was the time to lift the ban? Please.

Nothing the Pentagon does is without planning and fore thought, and it's unimaginable that President Obama was kept out of the loop in deciding to announce this at this time.

- Advertisement -

The military presents this new policy as giving women "equal opportunity". For sure, women in the military have long objected to being excluded from combat roles, which has been an impediment to their being promoted.

  Of course there are no qualms from here in giving women equal opportunity. It's long overdue and correct.

But again why is this being announced now? My sense is lifting the ban on women in combat now is simply a numbers game.  

It has nothing to do with women's ability to fly combat aircraft or carry a rifle as a combat infantry soldier.

Could it be there's a dearth of men available for combat? "Stop-Loss" demands have forced many male combat veterans to be sent back to war zones time and again even after previously serving 3 and 4 tours.

- Advertisement -

Maybe military recruiters are having difficulty filling their recruitment quotas with able bodied men?

Use of the National Guard in overseas combat has strained their ranks.

So"the simple solution is, lift the ban on women being in combat roles.   

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

dglefc22733@aol.com
Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".