Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

Federal Taxes Don't Pay For Anything

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

How often has President Obama said or suggested that, "we will go broke" or commented on this nation's inability to pay for all the programs and services we know we need? Or, we have to share the tax burden to pay for government services benefiting all Americans.

Answer: Too often.   And worse, he's misinformed about monetary policy.

None of our elected officials, their economic advisers, and few financial wizards, including those who advise President Obama, leave me to believe that they understand the real significance of deficits and taxation and the simple mechanics involved in reserve accounting with a sovereign fiat currency. 

What this leads to is that these "leaders" and "advisors" have it all backwards when they talk and write about deficits, and taxation because they have not, intellectually and operationally, made the transition from fixed exchange rates and gold standard principles, to flexible exchange rates and sovereign fiat currency principles.

Nor are they asking the right questions during this recession. The leadership class needs to ask "what is the purpose of deficit spending?" This question gets to the crux of the dilemma of our national recession.

Deficit spending needs to address public purposes. It needs to eliminate costly unemployment given insufficient private sector investment which continues to prolong and exacerbate this recession.  


Where's My Job by Robert Bostick

How can those on the right and left protest providing net assets to the private sector to employ all who want to work?

Only government sector deficit spending remains as the source through which 25 million Americans can begin to receive incomes.   How much deficit spending will be needed?   As much as it takes to reach full employment. How much in percentage terms will taxes need to be increased to reach full employment deficit spending?  

Zero.  

That's right. No increase in taxes or borrowing needed.   Instead, taxes on income need to be significantly reduced to allow immediate (next 12 months) and broad based economic benefits.

Is this irresponsible?   Not if our leaders take the time to understand that in a modern monetary system federal income tax collections don't support spending.   Among the operational axioms of modern monetary operations in America is this, "Federal Taxes Are Not Needed Only To Adjust Aggregate Demand."

Levying taxes on the rich, non-rich individuals or corporations to raise revenue is nonsense.   Continuing taxation of income, during a recession with 25-30 million unemployed, is counterproductive where the objective  is attaining full employment through deficit spending. Moreover, because the federal government (Treasury & the privately owned Federal Reserve) is the sole issuer of our currency, there is no need to raise revenue.

Think about this!

For 41 years we have believed, and our "leaders" have led us knowingly or unknowingly to accept, the road signs proclaiming, "Your Federal Taxes at Work."  

If you could create all the currency you needed to fund whatever you needed, why would you have to raise revenue through taxation? You wouldn't.   Moreover, you'd have to spend your currency/dollars first, before you could tax or borrow.

So why does the Federal government tax?   It taxes to manage spending, in other words to control inflation and deflation. That's it. It borrows for the same reason. They're automatic stabilizers.   However, there's a real downside during recessions which our erstwhile leaders don't understand.   The more they tax the more likely the economy will fall into recession and deflation. However, once full employment is achieved it may be necessary to resume income taxation to cool off a hot economy.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Raise the Debt Ceiling & Extended FICA Tax Cuts

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.im-jus-sayin.com

Retired ('92)after working for every Administration since Truman, with the exception of the last 3 administrations. Mainlining golf is a major addiction, along with grandchildren, travel, great books and the leisure to really absorb it all. A (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Forty One Years of Stupidity & Running by Robert Bostick on Friday, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:03:00 PM
I see we have an MMTer in our midst by Scott Baker on Friday, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:14:21 PM
Sovereign Debt Free Currency by Robert Bostick on Saturday, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:59:00 AM
Tax Revenues by Hoss Hoss on Saturday, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:51:58 PM
Tax Revenues by Robert Bostick on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:37:25 PM
Tweet: economics by Michael Dewey on Monday, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:47:50 AM
Tweet:Economics by Robert Bostick on Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:43:57 PM