Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 12, 2009 at 14:00:02

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/12/09:

Federal Prosecutors Want Longer Sentence for Siegelman

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Roger Shuler (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Roger Shuler - Writer

Federal Prosecutors Want Siegelman To Receive A Longer Sentence
Cross Posted at Legal Schnauzer
Federal prosecutors will seek a 20-year prison sentence for former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman when he receives a new sentencing hearing in federal court in Montgomery, according to a report just out from Associated Press.

Siegelman originally received a sentence of roughly seven years following his conviction on federal corruption charges. The new recommendation comes after a panel of three appellate judges dismissed two of the seven charges the former governor was convicted of and ordered a new sentencing hearing.

AP reports:


Prosecutors made the recommendation in a letter to federal probation officers. The probation officers will prepare a report recommending a new sentence to U.S. District Judge Mark Fuller.

Today's report is alarming for a couple of reasons:

(1) It lends credence to the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that upheld most of the convictions against Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy. Our research of the ruling, and the relevant law and facts, indicates the 11th Circuit's ruling was flawed, unlawful, and a continuation of the politics that have permeated the case from the outset.

(2) It indicates that federal prosecutors are acting as brazenly under the Barack Obama administration as they did under George W. Bush. We now have Eric Holder as attorney general, but today's news indicates that makes zero difference to the prosecutors who ramrodded the Siegelman case.

Is the 11th Circuit's ruling flawed? The answer is yes. You certainly won't hear about that from federal prosecutors, and no one in the mainstream press is likely to examine the ruling closely enough to determine whether it is legit or not.

But we have studied the ruling and found it be full of holes. Our findings are coming soon.

 

www.legalschnauzer.blogspot.com

I live in Birmingham, Alabama, and work in higher education. I became interested in justice-related issues after experiencing gross judicial corruption in Alabama state courts. This corruption has a strong political component. The corrupt judges are (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Alabama Convictions"
Thou shalt not expunge Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Lackey.(Alabama): An article from: Jones Law Review
by Brian Overstreet

$9.95

Number of pages: 23
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Post-conviction remedies in Alabama capital cases
by John L Carroll


Number of pages:
Publisher: Southern Poverty Law Center

Procedure trumps justice: judicial inactivism in Alabama and its unjust result.: An article from: Jones Law Review
by Clayton Tartt

$9.95

Number of pages: 41
Publisher: Thomas Goode Jones School of Law

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Bushies still in Justice? by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 1:23:20 PM
And Bush by shirley reese on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 10:08:13 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum