Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
July 26, 2008 at 11:01:56

View Ratings | Rate It

FLS & OMDD Who has these?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Dale Hill (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Dale Hill - Writer

Functional, Linguistic Disability And Open-Mic Dysfunctional Disease

There is no doubt that our past presidents, ... in pre-television days, had better vocabularies than contestants do today. Of course, Bill Clinton was an exception, while George W. and McCain are exemplary candidates of the observation. Back in John Adams and Abe Lincoln days, to win the presidency, candidates had to be able to give speeches. Today, it is sound and video-bites that win an elections. We have a president and a Republican candidate who are examples of "Functional, Linguistic Disability AND Open-Mic Dysfunctional Disease."

McCain has a serious case of "OPMDD,' which can be verified in his last open-mic efforts. McCain sounded good, but his substance was asinine. Though McCain faked his knowledge of "The Surge," he had no idea of the specifics of the campaign. His dates were wrong, a huge mistake, and examples of the outcomes were wrong as well. CNN had to cover up his mistakes, and going back through his other open mic experiences, misstatements are the norm for McCain and not, non-sustaining accidents. McCain needs huge rubber bands that continually pull him back to the teleprompter to keep him from uttering verbal nonsense by forcing him to read his speeches. Alzheimers? I think not, but if we expect more from McCain, it won't happen in his lifetime. On the other hand, Bush Linguistic Disability is so common that we expect it.

"They (Taliban) have no disregard for human life." Read that again. The sentence was uttered by George W. during the last press-conference. With winks and smirks, Bush thought he had the upper hand during the conference, and the sad thing is, our press aloud "allowed" the lame-duck president to get by with the misstatement.

Let's look at the statement. "no-disregard" is actually a double negative and, though they sound good, the two syllables together mean just the opposite what the speaker wants to say. Having "no disregard," actually means having regard. Thus, what "W' said, was that the Taliban has regard for human life - something far from the truth. So, while Bush and was smirking and winking his way the press conference, his speech was anything but exemplary.

200,000 Germans showed up to hear a no teleprompter speech from Obama and that is just what they got. The United States deserves the same in a president. We have had 8 years of linguistic fuzziness and we don't need another 8 years of the same with McCain.

 

Is a 34 year retired educator with a Masters Degree in Counseling - a free-lance writer with articles in Spanish and English Guideposts, Mothering, Oklahoma Observer, Oklahoma Gazette, Westview, Oklahoma Reader, The Lookout, Christian Standard, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Conference Elections McCain John"

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum