Tags for This Article:

Congress (3097)  Security (1133)  Reform (522)  Lawsuits (455)  Citizens (444)  Surveillance (392)  FISA (311)  Immunity (174)  Domestic Spying (157)  Communications (150)  FISA (87)  FISA (77)  Constitutional Crisis (62)  Fourth Amendment (32)  NSA (4) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 19, 2008 at 19:15:25

RepubliDems Grant Domestic Spy Powers; Protect Telcos

by Ed Morrissey (Posted by Watching)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Congress will pass long delayed FISA reform legislation as early as tomorrow after key members of the House reached a compromise on a series of issues.  The compromise has the backing of House leadership, the White House, and the telecommunications companies fearful of an endless series of lawsuits from their earlier cooperation with the NSA.  This bill will permanently update FISA legislation to encompass what became known as the Terrorist Surveillance Program, as well as modernize it to eliminate the archaic language that required warrants for international communications:

After more than a year of partisan acrimony over government surveillance powers, Democratic and Republican leaders have agreed to a bipartisan deal that would be the most sweeping rewrite of spy powers in three decades. The House is likely to vote on the measure Friday, House aides said.

Removing the final barrier to action on the measure, which has been hashed out in recent weeks by senior lawmakers in both parties, House Democratic leaders decided to allow a vote on the bill, despite the opposition of many in their party.

The new agreement broadens the authority to spy on people in the U.S. and provides conditional legal immunity to companies that helped the government eavesdrop after the 2001 terrorist attacks, according to congressional aides in both parties.

The deal, if adopted, would bring the spy activities of a controversial National Security Agency surveillance program permanently under the law. That would allow the government, in certain circumstances, to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens without a specific warrant. It would also expand government spy powers to monitor communications between the U.S. and overseas to collect intelligence on topics beyond terrorism.

This deal does not include explicit immunity for the telecoms.  It does, however, provide a standard by which a federal court can determine whether each telecom qualifies for the immunity provisions in the bill by verifying that they received requests and/or approvals from federal agencies that assured the telecoms of the legality of their cooperation.  Although it requires a court proceeding to grant immunity, it establishes a clear presumption in favor of the telecoms.

The compromise will make permanent the changes that Congress temporarily applied last summer.  That means the FISA reform issue will be settled once and for all, and the legal tripwire of "American switches" will no longer remain extant.  Given that most of the world's communications pass through American switches regardless of whether either end of them terminate in the US, that will make it much easier for the NSA to nimbly follow terrorist communications without the retarding effect of warrant applications on each new pathway.Expect the netroots to shame Congress.  They managed to stall the compromise during the Democratic primaries and provided a small boomlet to Chris Dodd's campaign - which remained almost too small to detect.  They will scream about the Democratic collapse on this issue, when the FISA changes have long had bipartisan support, as did telecom immunity in the Senate.   The loss on this issue will create a firestorm of rage that will soon subside to sharp bitterness.

For the rest of us, the agreement came far too late, but yet in time to keep the last of the NSA's working orders from expiring.  We may never know how much intelligence got lost from February to now - and we'd better hope we never have to find out.

 

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

JC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

JC GarrettJC Garrett is a freelance writer and Constitutional scholar from the piney-woods of East Texas. He apologizes to the entire world that the great Lone Star State could have produced the neo-Neanderthal currently occupying the Oval Office.

"I'm not ashamed to be an American. I'm ashamed George W. Bush is an American."

Mr. Garrett owns and operates an independent recording studio, plays several instruments, writes, sings, and produces music.

His stories have ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Tyranny In Action

This is pure authoritarian fear-mongering. This FISA "compromise" is just what its name implies - a compromise of Americans' civil liberties for NOTHING in return.

Law professor Johnathan Turley pointed out that this "compromise" is no compromise at all - it gives Bush nearly everything he asked for to begin with. Mr. Turley also states that there is nothing in the proposed legislation that can be construed as good for Americans, and that the bill has "...no public value for citizens or civil liberties."

Americans gain nothing from this bill, and they pretty much lose their rights under the 4th Amendment. This was stopped last time by hundreds of thousands of letters and calls from citizens to Congress. It MUST be stopped this time, too.

Read more here: Sneaking FISA Through the Back Door

"Liberty, once lost, is lost forever." -- John Adams

by JC Garrett (38 articles, 61 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 551 comments) on Friday, June 20, 2008 at 3:07:44 AM
 


Nobody special.
WatchingNobody special.

The Democrats have shown their complicity

Do any of you still think the Democrats are on our side?

by Watching (0 articles, 1 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 313 comments) on Saturday, June 21, 2008 at 10:50:23 AM
 


I live on an island off the coast of Maine. Political junkie of liberal persuasion.
I have long been a registered Independent and now am a member of the Maine Green Independent Party.

Widower, grandfather of two, retired.

Jack HarringtonI live on an island off the coast of Maine. Political junkie of liberal persuasion.
I have long been a registered Independent and now am a member of the Maine Green Independent Party.

Widower, grandfather of two, retired.

Congressional Democrats

are as guilty as their Republican counterparts.

The people of America are no longer sovereign, the corporations are. The Constitution has been thrown in the mud by both major parties. The Bill of Rights is a mere wistful memory.

And they expect us to re-elect them in Nov.

They demand our votes in their support. They do not countenance our supporting other candidacies. 

If folks who say that third party candidates have no chance of electoral success would just vote for  third party candidates, maybe we could have an impact and get our message across. When the two major parties support such similar policies and 'laws', why vote for either one? There is no advantage to voting Democrat, because Rahm Emmanuel and 2006 proved to us that the new boss is same as the old boss. Let's vote for a fresh movement, one that respects us, our rule of law, our Constitution and our bill of Rights.

Vote Green, vote third party, vote independent, but please stop wasting votes on the Republirats. Why continue performing a losing behavior? Why not vote for your interests, political, financial, familial?

Just say no to the Democrats AND the Republicans in November. 

by Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 306 comments) on Sunday, June 22, 2008 at 12:56:55 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

This Is Our Obama! Posted by Donna Roepenack

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

Martial Law? by Jayne Lyn Stahl

I Just Prevented Thousands of Californians from Having to Vote on Provisional Ballots! by Emily Levy

Go To Top 50 Most Popular