Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 14 (20 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

General News

FACT-CHECKED: Hannity's Lies Harming American Consumers

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 10/22/13

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)


Hannity Wages War on the Public Interest by gw

In disregard of the public interest, Sean Hannity used his radio and TV show to broadcast provably false information about the Affordable Care Act. Salon's fact-check of Sean Hannity on Obamacare" uncovered how he distorted the stories of three couples to imply that they were worse off under Obamacare's new rules. In fact, the couples are now able to get more coverage for less money, but Hannity did not retract his report. 

By last night, Hannity's lies were corrected on the Rachel Maddow Show, in the Washington Post, PoliticoCNN (VIDEO), Huffington Post and many other outlets. Hannity refuses to address any of the coverage calling him out for deceit.

But now Consumer Reports has also chimed in, correcting statements made by Hannity, The Hill and bloggers on Breitbart.com as "not true".

Consumer Reports advised shoppers the best time to enroll in Obamacare was a few weeks off, while expected delays and glitches at HealthCare.gov are ironed out. Hannity took this out-of-context, squealing "Consumer Reports, Ann, they're telling people, 'stay away from the website!' in a segment to Ann Coulter, when just the opposite was true. Consumer Reports has unequivocally endorsed the exchange as the best place to purchase health care.

Hannity's misinformation forced the nation's leading consumer reporting experts to issue the above correction so Americans can get accurate advice for purchasing policies.

Continuing The Anti-Obamacare Shutdown Madness
During recent weeks, Hannity's guests Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, John Boehner, Paul Ryan and Rand Paul have expounded on the ways Obamacare was going to kill jobs, trying to justify a shutdown that would cost our economy an estimated $24 billion and 120,000 jobs. These same Republican leaders could have offered any number of jobs bills that would sail through both houses if they really cared about boosting employment - the stalled transportation bill is one of the more immediate examples.

But they could also have modified Obamacare to ensure employers wouldn't cut staff if they so desired. The very idea that the ACA will cost jobs is an admission that it doesn't go far enough to ensure employers don't penalize workers in offering health coverage. 

Then, just hours after the shutdown failed to do anything and was overwhelmingly blamed on Republicans, Hannity threw his guests under the bus, saying it was time for the House leadership to be replaced!

Is It Legal To Lie On The Air?
Ironically, Hannity yesterday declared that he was a "radio professional" fully apprised of FCC rules. But the FCC's Communications Act going back decades requires stations to put "the public interest" ahead of the interests of the station owners or sponsors. Hannity scoffs at this, crapping on it's quasi-equal time provisions and prohibitions against on-air electioneering, ignoring community voices every day. 

Directly from the FCC website
"As public trustees, broadcasters may not intentionally distort the news. Broadcasters are responsible for deciding what their stations present to the public, and the FCC has stated publicly that "rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest."
Today, Hannity is costing the taxpayer valuable money and precious time, just as government agencies at all levels are trying to publicize state exchanges to cover the uninsured, Hannity is distorting the costs, impact on jobs and coverage options. 

Hannity avoids scrutiny by cleverly working off half-truths which are technically true but incomplete and misleading. For example, his claim that Obamacare is opposed by a majority of the public, withholds the fact that about half of those opposed to it feel that it didn't go far enough, meaning they want it to be many times larger in providing government-run healthcare. 

When a news outlet broadcasts falsehoods or in imbalance, the mechanism for recourse is to file complaints with the FCC, which are supposed to be considered during license renewals. Unfortunately, the FCC has turned a deaf ear to public complaints about broadcast bias and sided with the industry in almost every instance of controversy raised, citing great difficulty in documenting deliberate misrepresentation. 

The FCC's high bar recommends that "insiders" or "whistleblowers" turn in evidence showing written orders to distort the news. Otherwise, Hannity can simply say he made a mistake - exactly what he claimed when he was caught editing in stock footage to a report on a Tea Party rally to make it look more crowded.

Not surprisingly, the same FCC commissioners who refuse to stand up to democracy-killing broadcasters land comfortably in plum jobs with the broadcast industry - the most recent example being Meredith Atwell Baker who took a job with Comcast-NBC just four months after a vote to approve it's merger. Keeping the door revolving, the incoming commissioner is also a top industry lobbyist. Ugh.

Does Hannity Have To Offer Retractions?
Apparently, no - Hannity is unapologetic even after being caught lying and proven wrong in fact-checks by multiple mainstream media sources. He lets all criticisms sit unanswered and continues unabated, knowing many of his listeners do not venture outside their partisan bubbles. 

My burning question is what happens when his children come home from school after learning how actual debate is conducted, with all relevant facts laid out for a fair exchange of opposing views. What does he tell them about daddy's job, how does he explain why he can't allow any other perspectives on his show? Awkward.

As for OUR children, some of whom literally need health coverage as a life and death issue, how can we allow the #1 broadcaster in his time slot nationwide to lie daily about such important policies? 

If Hannity's misrepresentations about WMD in Iraq contributed to support for a war that resulted in thousands of troop deaths, if his lies led to a decade of middle class vampirism, falsely promising tax cuts for the rich create jobs, if he was caught baldly lying about Romney's polling, lying about gas availability and union thugs right in the middle of unfolding disasters like Superstorm Sandy, doesn't the American public at some point need to protect itself from more harm and damage coming via Hannity's perpetually forked tongue?

Are we powerless to protect the public interest from this Orwellian takeover?

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"Is It Legal To Lie On The Air?"If it is then libe... by Bill Johnson on Wednesday, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:01:51 PM
BillLast week a Republican (Tea Party) Congressper... by Cliff Carson on Wednesday, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:36:42 PM
Bill, I'd be willing to denounce liberals lying on... by Gustav Wynn on Wednesday, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:22:33 PM
I'm not saying he was not lying. All I am saying i... by Bill Johnson on Thursday, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06:26 PM
I asked you when you've seen a consumer watchdog g... by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:30:30 PM
My proof? All you gotta do is a google search of t... by Bill Johnson on Thursday, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:25:50 PM
No proof? I Googled that and got right-wing smear ... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:12:37 AM
Well you do your so called homework against conser... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:36:52 AM
Had you actually looked my track record ... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:48:26 AM
This controversy was finally brought up on Hannit... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:49:21 PM