![]() |
By sherry clark (about the author) Page 1 of 2 page(s)
For OpEdNews: sherry clark - Writer "Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say that there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe". Global Climate Change.
~~Frank Zappa

Like other religions, some believers run hot and some run cold, but I ask all believers of the "science of global climate change" --how can it run both ways?
Of course, I'm not a scientist, nor do I play one on tv. Yet when I honestly look at the ability of "competent" Ohio weathermen to accurately predict a decent 5-day forecast, people who track many real-time global weather indicators and well-documented patterns with high-tech gadgetry, I definitely doubt the wisdom of Al Gore and his followers to use the measurements of one (harmless) trace element encased in ancient ice to predict with absolute certainty the coming catastrophic change in our climate.
Even relativity is just a theory and subject to debate. On the other hand, there are the laws of gravity--where objects are attracted to the earth, and of politics--where corruption is attracted to politicians. To sum, global warming is the kind of science you get when you introduce politics and the corresponding laws that govern politicians...virtually none. If you think any politician who advances such political 'science' would then be able to form a plan to positively counter its impact, then be prepared for disappointment.
It turns out, not only am I not alone in doubting the 'science' of global warming, I have a lot of very good company.
By the way, before his death, Roger Revelle [Al Gore's global warming mentor] coauthored a paper cautioning that CO2 and its greenhouse effect did not warrant extreme countermeasures. Unfortunately, we are in the midst of these "extreme countermeasures" forming a theocracy here in these United States, and the "Inconvenient Truth" will be our new Bible.
I for one do not adhere to its tenets of faith and I will refuse to pay any tithe to this new American doctrine.
Why would our leaders advance the belief in global warming?
Follow the money.
In light of the United States' serious financial problems, with no silver or gold in our vaults, no manufacturing base, and trillions owed to foreign entities -- what else does the United States have to sell besides a lot of hot air?
Which brings me to the newly named 'commodity' (you know, things like gold, platinum and silver) of...carbon credits. Since no one in their right mind would want to buy such a 'commodity' voluntarily, the Obama Administration named the first Climate Czar -- you can call her the Taxwoman.
1 | 2
www.TheLibertyVoice.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 10 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |