Tags for This Article:

Iraq (5342) Military (3250) American Foreign Policy (740) Afghanistan (705) Afghanistan (645) Pakistan (622) Taliban (278) Taliban (272) Intervention (54)


Populum
Tag Cloud
Control Panel

Fine tune your search to access content

Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
December 5, 2008 at 07:42:26

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Escalation in Afghanistan: A Really Bad Idea

by Stephen Unger     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

The war in Afghanistan is heating up. Casualties among Afghanis, NATO troops, and American troops are rising. After seven years of the US intervention, no end is in sight. Rather, the outgoing and incoming US Presidents have agreed that more US troops should be sent there. (Recent reports indicate plans to increase US forces from 32,000 to 52,000 troops. There are also about 40,000 NATO soldiers there.)


Why are we there? The initial reason was to avenge the 9/11 atrocity, which was apparently supported by forces based in Afghanistan. Capturing Osama bin Laden and wiping out al-Qaeda was the concrete goal. This soon morphed into the objective of toppling the Taliban government, since they were said to have hosted al-Qaeda. The Taliban regime was indeed overthrown, but bin Laden and al-Qaeda escaped to Pakistan. Additional objectives were mentioned at various times, including securing women's rights in Afghanistan, democratizing and stabilizing that country, and eliminating it as a source of opiates. The only clear success has been the ousting of the Taliban government.

But, in recent years, during which the US supported Karzai government has been unable to establish itself in large parts of the country, the Taliban has rallied to become a strong contender for national power. The position of women has reverted to that existing prior to the reign of the Soviet-backed government, the one under which they were best treated.


Ironically, while ruling the country, the Taliban had reduced opium production to a small fraction of its previous amount, but, as an anti-government force, it derives much of its financial resources from a large increase in the drug trade, which is also encouraged by corrupt officials of the current regime. In effect, the Taliban is largely financed by drug sales in the US. Afghanistan now accounts for about 90% of world heroin production.


Clearly there are a lot of Afghans who do not want US troops in their country. Consider that Afghanistan is considerably larger than Iraq, that its terrain is unusually rugged, that it is more populous than Iraq, and that it has a long history of fighting off invaders, including the British when their empire was at its peak. The Soviet Union, failing to learn from the US experience in Vietnam, blundered into the nine-year Soviet-Afghan War, which turned out to be an important factor in their demise. How long would it take for US and NATO forces to "win" in Afghanistan, and exactly what would constitute victory?


Since bin Laden and al-Qaeda no longer reside in Afghanistan, what is the justification for continuing the US military intervention in that country? Are we there for the benefit of the Afghans? If so, just which Afghans are we helping? Why are we sacrificing young Americans to help this group? Consider how many other countries there are with dysfunctional governments that abuse various subgroups of their populations. How many of them are going to be recipients of US aid delivered at gunpoint? Since the Taliban is receiving help from across the Pakistani border and US forces have already attacked such helpers in Pakistan, are we going to get into a war with Pakistan as well?


I suggest that, rather than escalate our involvement in Afghanistan, while slowly reducing our forces in Iraq, we withdraw our military forces promptly and completely from both countries, and offer them economic aid to be administered by the UN.

12/5/08

 

Stephen H. Unger Professor, Emeritus, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Columbia University. Apart from technical areas, I have a strong interest in technology and society issues and in engineering ethics.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

Igniter of brush-fires in the minds of men.
Michael FuryIgniter of brush-fires in the minds of men.

The Central Asian Great Game

"...what is the justification for continuing the US military intervention in that country?"

Permanent bases in Central Asia to counter Russian energy dominance by controlling oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian basin.

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/the-ones-who-attacked-us/

But no doubt you know this and your question is purely rhetorical, right Professor?

by Michael Fury (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 81 comments) on Friday, December 5, 2008 at 8:40:51 AM
 

 

1 comments

 
Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/populum/database.inc.php on line 48

Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/populum/database.inc.php on line 48

Warning: mysql_fetch_array(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/opednews/public_html/populum/database.inc.php on line 48

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

John S. Greenway by AJ Buttacavoli

Cancer Full Moon January 10-11 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Breaking The Real "Last Taboo" - The Things No One Dares To Say by Frank Schaeffer

Goodbye to Bush in Three Minutes by David Swanson

Preliminary Memorandum of the Justice Robert H. Jackson Conference on Federal Prosecutions of War Criminals by Lawrence Velvel

First Bees, Now Birds by George Washington

FOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS - the intended QUICKSAND now taking under all sustainable agriculture by Linn Cohen-Cole

Amnesty vs. AIPAC: Senate to Consider AIPAC Resolution Endorsing War in Gaza by Robert Naiman

Boot Bush on 19th by David Swanson

More about sociopaths in American politics by Gene Messick

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009